Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Theranos CEO Holmes: We Turned Down Google Ventures, Not the Other Way Around

Elizabeth Holmes claims she never even met Google Ventures’ Bill Maris.

Gilbert Carrasquillo / Getty

Earlier today, Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes took the stage at the WSJDLive Conference to defend her company, which has faced severe criticism following a Wall Street Journal investigation questioning the veracity of her startup’s blood-testing tech.

Holmes repeatedly disputed the Wall Street Journal report, along with other recent claims about Theranos. Among those claims: That Bill Maris, the high-powered investor who runs Google Ventures, passed on Theranos two years ago. It was the other way around, Holmes said.

In an interview with Business Insider on Tuesday, Maris said his firm considered Theranos two years ago, but declined. Here’s Maris: “We looked at it a couple times, but there was so much hand-waving — like, Look over here! — that we couldn’t figure it out. So, we just had someone from our life-science investment team go into Walgreens and take the test. And it wasn’t that difficult for anyone to determine that things may not be what they seem here.”

Asked about Maris’s comments, Holmes claimed she has never met Maris. She went further, adding that Google Ventures, which has invested in multiple medical health companies, approached Theranos but Theranos turned them down. “His firm asked us at one point if we wanted to meet and we said, ‘No,’” the CEO claimed.

Update: Google Ventures has given Re/code a statement from Maris:

Our team constantly looks at opportunities in life sciences and as a part of the process, we looked at Theranos. We had one of our team members take the test and were underwhelmed by the results and experience. We did not pursue an investment. Bigger picture: The critical issue is that there are a lot of patients who deserve to know whether their blood test results are accurate. That’s what really matters.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel