Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Sprint to Pay $2.95 Million for Failing to Notify Lower-Credit Customers They Were Being Charged Extra

The settlement, which requires court approval, also requires the carrier to give earlier notice if it plans to charge a customer more than those with better credit.

Sprint

The Federal Trade Commission said Wednesday that Sprint will pay $2.95 million in civil penalties to settle charges it failed to give proper notice to those with lower credit scores that they were being charged higher fees than more creditworthy customers.

In its complaint, the FTC said that Sprint put some such customers in a program that required them to pay a $7.99 monthly fee on top of their other charges.

“Sprint failed to give many consumers required information about why they were placed in a more costly program, and when they did, the notice often came too late for consumers to choose another mobile carrier,” FTC consumer protection bureau director Jessica Rich said in a statement.

The FTC said Sprint failed to provide timely notice, often alerting consumers only after the time period in which they could cancel their service without a fee.

The proposed settlement, which is subject to court approval, would also require Sprint to provide customers with earlier notice of being placed in a higher-priced plan.

Sprint, for its part, said it was including almost all of the relevant information in its disclosures, but made changes in July as part of its effort to settle the matter.

“Sprint puts its customers first and is always working to provide clear and necessary information to customers,” the company said in a statement. “We appreciated the dialogue with the FTC and we have already implemented the changes requested.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Anthropic just made AI scarierAnthropic just made AI scarier
Podcast
Podcasts

Why the company’s new AI model is a cybersecurity nightmare.

By Dustin DeSoto and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol