Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Tim Cook Doesn’t Care if PCs Are Dying, Says Apple Has Big Plans for Health Tech

“As long as we cannibalize [ourselves], it’s fine.”

Re/code

Apple has shipped its new iPhones, it has just begun selling its new Apple TV model and the physically massive supposed PC-killing iPad Pro goes on sale tomorrow. Great. What’s next for the world’s most valuable tech company?

In an interview with the Telegraph’s Allister Heath, Apple CEO Tim Cook teased that the company is working on an as yet unrevealed health technology project, and said he’s fine with eventual declines in Apple’s desktop computing business, positioning the iPad Pro as its successor.

“Yes, the iPad Pro is a replacement for a notebook or a desktop for many, many people. They will start using it and conclude they no longer need to use anything else, other than their phones,” Cook said. He added that it doesn’t bother him if consumers move to iPads and smartphones instead of Macs or MacBooks, because “as long as we cannibalize [ourselves], it’s fine.”

But the real meat of the interview is in what Cook suggested about the future of the Apple Watch. He declined to any share Apple Watch sales numbers (other than to say this quarter would be record-setting), but he played up the watch’s medical technology angle quite a bit, referencing an American high school senior whose life was saved by the device’s heart rate monitor.

Here’s the relevant portion, in which Cook says more Apple health tech is on the way but that he doesn’t want to submit the watch for FDA approval:

Cook hints that Apple may have more plans for the health sphere, in a revelation which will intrigue Wall Street, but he doesn’t want the watch itself to become a regulated, government-licensed health product. “We don’t want to put the watch through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) process. I wouldn’t mind putting something adjacent to the watch through it, but not the watch, because it would hold us back from innovating too much, the cycles are too long. But you can begin to envision other things that might be adjacent to it — maybe an app, maybe something else.”

You can read the full interview on the Telegraph’s website.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel