Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Snapchat Tries Another Way to Make Money: More In-App Purchases

Snapchat is selling lenses now, too.

Snapchat is trying to figure out how to turn its 100 million-plus daily users into daily contributors to its bottom line, and it’s throwing all kinds of ideas at the wall to see what sticks.

On Friday it started testing another: A “lens store” where users can pay 99 cents to transform their selfies by adding special effects or costumes to the image. The company has offered free lenses for a few months, and even tested its first sponsored lens last month with Fox Studios to promote the new “Peanuts” movie. But some of the original, popular lenses — like the one that allows users to “puke” rainbows — disappeared over time to make room for new designs. Well, now Snapchat is bringing them back for a small fee.

The store isn’t so much a destination within the app as it is a prompt to purchase a lens that’s no longer available for free. It’s the second type of in-app purchase the company has rolled out since September. You can also buy “replays” within the app, which allows you to rewatch a snap that you’ve already seen.

On the surface, in-app purchases seem like a small revenue driver compared to Snapchat’s more mature ad products, which can generate well over half a million dollars for just 24 hours in some cases. But the idea of charging 99 cents for anything within the app just shows how important revenue is for Snapchat — and how it’s still trying to figure out which revenue drivers may actually work. The store helps set a precedent for other in-app purchases down the road, too, which the company has hinted at in the past.

Snapchat is still working to live up to a $16 billion valuation, after all, and it didn’t get a glowing endorsement this week from investor Fidelity, which downgraded the value of the company stock it holds by 25 percent. Selfies can’t hurt.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel