Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

In one paragraph, investment managers demonstrate the futility of GOP climate denial

“Yes, sir, I realize the blog post says it’s all sunspots, but ...”
“Yes, sir, I realize the blog post says it’s all sunspots, but ...”
“Yes, sir, I realize the blog post says it’s all sunspots, but ...”
(Shutterstock)

BlackRock is the world’s largest investment firm, with some $4.5 trillion in assets under management. Needless to say, those trillions make BlackRock highly motivated to accurately assess the forces and trends at work in global markets; it doesn’t have the luxury of ideological blinders.

So I was struck by the opening paragraph of a comprehensive new report the BlackRock Investment Institute recently released on “The Price of Climate Change: Global Warming’s Impact on Portfolios.“ It is, at least relative to the usual bloodless language of investment reports, remarkably blunt:

You may or may not believe man-made climate change is real or dismiss the science behind it. No matter. Climate change risk has arrived as an investment issue. Governments are setting targets to curb greenhouse gas emissions. This may pave the way for policy shifts that we could see ripple across industries. The resulting regulatory risks are becoming key drivers of investment returns.

In other words: Like it or not, climate isn’t going away.

This is widely understood almost everywhere in the world, except inside the hermetically sealed bubble of US conservatism. Inside that bubble, they still believe that climate skeptics are winning the debate, that the whole edifice of climate science is about to crumble. They still believe that electing a Republican president is all it will take to get rid of climate regulations once and for all. They still believe that coal can be revived and that oil and gas are the economic future.

They are wrong. And people who listen to them are going to lose money.

See More:

More in Climate

Climate
Can you profit off nature without destroying it? These venture capitalists are betting on it.Can you profit off nature without destroying it? These venture capitalists are betting on it.
Climate

Lionfish leather and AI to reduce bird collisions: See all the innovations that a new “biodiversity” VC firm is backing.

By Benji Jones
Climate
The electric grid’s next power source might be sitting in your drivewayThe electric grid’s next power source might be sitting in your driveway
Climate

Batteries that could help drive the switch to renewable energy are already, well, driving.

By Matt Simon
Climate
The real reason your monthly gas bill keeps going upThe real reason your monthly gas bill keeps going up
Climate

Are we paying for infrastructure we won’t need?

By Carrie Klein
Climate
The surprising truth about loggingThe surprising truth about logging
Climate

The reality behind Trump’s push to log more public forests is weirdly complicated.

By Benji Jones
Climate
How climate science is sneakily getting funded under TrumpHow climate science is sneakily getting funded under Trump
Climate

Scientists are keeping their climate work alive by any other name.

By Kate Yoder, Ayurella Horn-Muller and 1 more
Climate
The Western US is already running out of water — and summer is still months awayThe Western US is already running out of water — and summer is still months away
Climate

Ski slopes are closed, sprinklers are banned, and more restrictions are still to come.

By Kiley Price