Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

One quote that shows how the media covers mass shootings differently based on race

Chapel Hill police investigate the murder of three young Muslims
Chapel Hill police investigate the murder of three young Muslims
Chapel Hill police investigate the murder of three young Muslims
Al Drago / The News & Observer / Tribune News Service via Getty Images

We don’t yet know the motivation for Tuesday night’s murder of three young Muslim students in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Mainstream media coverage has taken a measured approach to reporting on the murders and avoided jumping to conclusions about what may have prompted the killings.

That’s a good thing. We don’t have much information about this crime yet, and speculating too much in the meantime won’t be helpful. But to many members of the Muslim community in the US, the stark difference between this approach and the way the media has covered other crimes — particularly when committed by black or Muslim suspects — speaks to larger, frustrating issues, as perfectly summarized by this tweet:

Or, even more bluntly, in this one:

In other words, when Muslims or African-Americans commit crimes, the media is eager not only to see those acts as part of a broader pattern, but also to interpret them as evidence that those communities embraced norms or values that contributed, at least indirectly, to violence.

That tendency takes many forms. Demands that moderate Muslims personally condemn every act of Islamist terrorism, for instance. Or assertions that black “culture” encourages black people to commit crime.

If white Americans commit similar crimes, however, the response tends to be quite different. People like Elliot Rodger, whose murder spree at the University of Santa Barbara in 2014 killed six people and injured 13 others, or James Holmes, who murdered 12 people and wounded 70 more in a mass shooting at a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, are treated like mentally ill individuals, not as evidence of broader problems with “white culture.”

Both types of coverage miss something. It’s not reasonable to jump to broad conclusions about the norms or values of a community based on the actions of a single member, or a few members. And it’s bigoted to imply that Muslims are responsible for other people’s crimes if they don’t actively denounce them. But it’s also true that white men, even those who are mentally ill, can potentially be motivated by forms of extremism. Rodger, for instance, had a long history of mental illness, but was also motivated by extreme misogynist views that were reinforced in the communities he joined online.

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff