Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

The judge in Mississippi’s modern-day lynching case gave a must-read speech on racism

(Shutterstock)

James Craig Anderson, a black Mississippi man, was killed in 2011 by ten white teenagers, who, according to police, had decided to "go fuck with some niggers."

In a horrific attack that’s been called a “brutal, Jim Crow-style lynching,” they reportedly found Anderson in a parking lot, brutalized him, and ran over him with a pickup truck while yelling “white power.”

Three of the defendants — Deryl Dedmon, Dylan Butler and John Rice — each pleaded guilty in March 2012 to one count of conspiracy and one count of committing a hate crime. They were sentenced Tuesday by a federal district court judge Carlton Reeves.

Reeves, who was appointed by President Obama in 2010, is the second African-American federal judge to serve in Mississippi. He used his remarks at the sentencing hearing to give an unflinching analysis of the tragedy and the long history of racism — especially in that state — that inspired it.

The blog Breach of Peace published Reeves’ entire statement, which includes Anderson’s analysis of what he calls Mississippi’s “infatuation with lynchings,” as well the things that give him hope for the future — like a system that now includes racially diverse officials who “know that in advancing the rule of law, the criminal justice system must operate without regard to race, creed or color.”

The most striking part of the speech is when, after enumerating some of their horrific actions, he clearly details the force behind the tragedy: racial hatred. He says it’s both what turned the teenage boys into criminals, and what doomed their victim at birth:

I asked the question earlier, but what could transform these young adults into the violent creatures their victims saw? It was nothing the victims did . . . they were not championing any cause . . . political . . . social . . . economic . . . nothing they did . . . not a wolf whistle . . . not a supposed crime . . . nothing they did. There is absolutely no doubt that in the view of the Court the victims were targeted because of their race.

The simple fact is that what turned these children into criminal defendants was their joint decision to act on racial hatred. In the eyes of these defendants (and their coconspirators) the victims were doomed at birth . . . their genetic make-up made them targets.

The seven others defendants are awaiting sentencing.

Reeves' entire statement over at Breach of Peace is worth reading.

(h/t: Thinkprogress)

Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
These reforms could transform criminal justice for people — and they cost almost nothingThese reforms could transform criminal justice for people — and they cost almost nothing
Future Perfect

Crime is falling to historic lows. This economist knows how to make it plunge even faster.

By Bryan Walsh
Podcasts
The influencer circus around Nancy Guthrie’s homeThe influencer circus around Nancy Guthrie’s home
Podcast
Podcasts

Are they harming the investigation — or just doing the same thing as CNN?

By Kelli Wessinger and Sean Rameswaram
Policy
The Supreme Court appears likely to let stoners own gunsThe Supreme Court appears likely to let stoners own guns
Policy

Gun lovers may soon have the right to bear bongs.

By Ian Millhiser