Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Ericsson Sues Apple for Telecom Patent Infringement

The patents at issue involve the 2G and 4G/LTE standards.

Reuters / Bob Strong

Swedish mobile telecom gear maker Ericsson is suing Apple for patent infringement after Apple refused Ericsson’s offer to have a court determine fair licensing terms, Ericsson said on Friday.

Ericsson said it filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) requesting an exclusion order against Apple’s products for infringing Ericsson patents that are essential to the 2G and 4G/LTE standards.

It also filed a second ITC complaint seeking an exclusion order and multiple complaints in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas requesting damages and injunctions for infringement of patents “critical to many other aspects of Apple’s devices.”

Gustav Brismark, head of patent strategy at Ericsson, told Reuters that Apple’s previous license agreement with Ericsson had expired around mid-January.

Ericsson filed a complaint in mid-January against Apple over mobile technology license payments, responding to a lawsuit from the iPhone maker.

Apple filed its suit on Jan. 12, alleging the LTE wireless technology patents were not essential to industry cellular standards and that Ericsson was demanding excessive royalties.

If the dispute with Apple went Ericsson’s way, the U.S. firm would have to pay it between $250 million and $750 million annually, analysts said after Ericsson’s complaint in January, based on estimates of levels of handset sales and royalty payments per phone.

Ericsson had intellectual property rights revenue of $1.18 billion in 2014.

Ericsson, the world’s No. 1 mobile network equipment manufacturer, ahead of China’s Huawei and Finland’s Nokia, said two years ago it was prioritizing IP rights revenue, given its patent portfolio and investments in research and development.

(Reporting by Olof Swahnberg)

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram