Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

German Court Imposes National Ban on Some Uber Services

The company will appeal the ruling that it is in violation of licensing rules.

A German regional court on Wednesday issued a nationwide ban on online taxi service Uber, barring it from operating commercial services and levying stiff fines for any violations of the country’s local transport laws.

Each violation of the order against Uber and its UberPop online service is subject to a 250,000 euro ($264,825) fine, a three-judge panel of the Frankfurt regional court ruled.

An Uber spokesman said the company expected to appeal the court’s decision.

“We regret today’s decision by the Frankfurt regional court to prevent Uber from contributing to better and cheaper ‎individual mobility,” Uber Germany General Manager Fabien Nestmann said outside the courtroom.

Uber also said it will continue to operate services using professional limousine drivers and licensed taxi cab drivers.

“We will not give up on the German market: our UberBlack and UberTaxi services remain unaffected by today’s judgment,” an emailed statement from the company said.

It also said it was working on a new alternative ridesharing service designed to comply with the court’s interpretations of existing German laws.

The case, brought by German taxi operator group Taxi Deutschland, is one of more than a dozen lawsuits that have been filed in countries across Europe in recent months against the San Francisco-based company.

Dieter Schlenker, chairman of the Taxi Deutschland cooperative, hailed the decision as a move that would protect professional taxi drivers from competition by unlicensed casual workers employed by Uber.

“What does this mean for the 255,000 taxi drivers and employees in 700 radio taxi control centers? It means legal certainty — 255,000 real jobs and taxpayers will remain in Germany,” Schlenker said following the ruling.

Earlier, during a court hearing, Uber attorneys faced intense questioning by the judges, who said the company violated both German and European laws.

Presiding Judge Joachim Nickel said during the hearing that Uber violated German laws on commercial passenger transportation since its drivers did not have the right kinds of licenses.

“There is a violation of the passenger transport law because drivers operate without authorization,” Nickel said.

Uber, which enables users to summon taxi-like services on their phones, is under fire from taxi operators and city officials across Europe who allege that the service breaches licensing laws governing professional taxi drivers and informal ride-sharing arrangements.

Attorneys representing Uber denied it was subject to rules governing taxi operators, claiming that the company merely acts as an exchange connecting drivers with clients.

In response, Uwe Eilers, a second judge on the three-judge panel, said: “In that case, you should include in your business description that Uber offers rides for free.”

Taxi industry groups and some taxi drivers complain that Uber unfairly bypasses local licensing and safety regulations by using the Internet to put drivers in touch with passengers. However, many licensed taxi drivers work with Uber as a way to supplement their existing incomes.

Uber offers a range of local transport options from professional limousine services to informal ride-sharing options. UberPop, an online service that links private drivers with passengers via their mobile phones, is the target of many of the lawsuits.

(Additional reporting by Peter Maushagen; Editing by Greg Mahlich and Keith Weir)

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram