Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Ted Cruz’s website poses unnecessary security risks for donors

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)
Alex Wong/Getty Images

It’s one of the most fundamental rules of online security: if you’re asking for sensitive information such as a credit card number, you should use a technology called SSL, or Secure Sockets Layer. This type of encryption is built into all modern web browsers, and it prevents people who are eavesdropping on your communications from snatching your sensitive data.

This morning, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) announced his presidential campaign, and he launched a website that solicits campaign donations. But it doesn’t show the little icon that indicates SSL is enabled:

On SSL-protected websites, there should be a padlock icon in the address bar, like this:

As it turns out, the website does use SSL when users actually submit their credit card information. But there are two big problems with the way this is implemented. One is that the lack of SSL protection for the donation page as a whole means that the user is vulnerable to a “man in the middle” attack, where someone impersonates the Cruz website and directs the user to a malicious site instead.

Second, there’s no way for ordinary users to know if their credit card details are encrypted or not. For more than a decade, users have been trained to look for that lock icon before submitting personal information. The way Cruz built his website encourages users to do something dangerous: submit personal credit card information without knowing if it’s secure or not. If this practice became widespread, users will be more vulnerable because they’ll never know if their information is secure or not.

It turns out that the Ted Cruz for president site does offer SSL protection if you navigate to it directly by adding an “https://” in front of the address. However, when I go there with Chrome, I get the not-very-reassuring message that “this page includes other resources which are not secure,” meaning that some parts of the webpage are encrypted and others are not. And then there’s this:

This is the SSL certificate for tedcruz.org, the digitally signed document that’s supposed to prove you’re really visiting tedcruz.org rather than an imposter site trying to steal your credit card number. SSL certificates sometimes list alternative addresses for the same website. For example, if Cruz also owned tedcruz.com, the SSL certificate could list that as an alternative domain.

For some reason, the SSL certificate for tedcruz.org lists nigerian-prince.com as another valid address for Cruz’s website. (Update: the Cruz campaign appears to have removed nigerian-prince.com from the certificate around 11am.)

Thanks to Twitter user Pwn All the Things for pointing this out.

A Ted Cruz campaign spokesman responded in an email statement: "The donate form embedded on TedCruz.org has SSL. All donations are and have always been secure. Our website earns an A-grade for its SSL."

Correction: This article originally stated that the site doesn’t use SSL encryption at all. In fact, the submission of the credit card data is encrypted, but the lack of encryption for the donation page as a whole creates unnecessary risks for user security, as explained above.

See More:

More in Politics

Politics
The real problem with Hasan PikerThe real problem with Hasan Piker
Politics

Spoiler: It’s not about Israel.

By Eric Levitz
The Highlight
The return of resistance craftingThe return of resistance crafting
The Highlight

Want to fight fascism? Join a knitting circle.

By Anna North
Politics
Nobody is laughing at Donald Trump anymoreNobody is laughing at Donald Trump anymore
Politics

The media-obsessed president’s first White House Correspondents’ Dinner is going to flop. It’s not because of the crowd.

By Benjy Sarlin
The Logoff
Trump’s big marijuana moveTrump’s big marijuana move
The Logoff

Rescheduling medical marijuana, briefly explained.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Netanyahu may finally be in troubleNetanyahu may finally be in trouble
Politics

The Israeli leader faces an uphill battle in this year’s elections.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Trump’s cruel plan for Afghan refugees, briefly explainedTrump’s cruel plan for Afghan refugees, briefly explained
The Logoff

Afghan refugees currently in Qatar could be sent to Congo by the Trump administration.

By Cameron Peters