Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

How a redefinition made Yuengling the biggest craft brewery in America

Sarah Glenn/Getty Images
Libby Nelson
Libby Nelson was Vox’s editorial director, politics and policy, leading coverage of how government action and inaction shape American life. Libby has more than a decade of policy journalism experience, including at Inside Higher Ed and Politico. She joined Vox in 2014.

The Brewers Association made a list of the 50 largest craft breweries, and the biggest in the US last year was D. G. Yuengling and Son, the Pennsylvania-based brewers of Yuengling.

Biggest craft breweries in 2014

(Brewers Association)

Yuengling isn’t most people’s idea of a craft brewery: it’s the fourth-largest brewery in the US and doesn’t produce a highbrow IPA. But it dominates the list this year because the Brewers Association has changed how it defines craft beer — a decision that involves 15th-century Germany, 19th-century American agriculture, and 21st-century congressional politicking.

The basic question is what ingredients “craft beer” should contain

beer

(Quinn Dombrowski)

The Brewers Association used to require breweries to use only barley for their flagship beer and for most of their products. This restriction originated in the 15th century, in present-day Germany, where the Reinheitsgebot, or “purity law,” defined beer as made from only hops, barley, and water.

Big brewing companies often use rice, maize, or corn to produce lighter, cheaper beer. In 2011, the Brewers Association called out Yuengling, as well as other American breweries, for not being a true craft brewery because it uses those ingredients, known as adjuncts. (Their flagship beer includes corn grits.)

But some small American breweries took offense, arguing that they’ve been using adjunct ingredients for generations and that the practice began because American barley had higher protein content than European barley. Beers brewed with American barley needed adjuncts to produce lighter, shelf-stable beers.

“Why are we being punished for brewing with a locally grown ingredient, which started out of necessity, and has continued out of tradition?” wrote August Schell, a Minnesota brewery founded in 1860, in a letter to the brewers’ group.

The Brewers Association had changed its membership rules before — in 2010, it raised the cap on the number of barrels a company could produce per year so that Boston Brewing Company, which makes Sam Adams, wouldn’t be kicked out for getting too big. And it reconsidered again after the fight over Yuengling, August Schell, and other old American breweries that had long used adjuncts. In February 2014, the group got rid of the rule about adjunct ingredients, opening the way for Yuengling to be considered a craft beer.

Actually, this is a story about lobbying

congress

(Raymond Boyd/Getty Images)

The fight over adjunct ingredients was brewing (pun intended) at the same time as a fight between beermakers in Congress. The Brewers Association is in a lobbying battle with the Beer Institute, a lobbying group that includes the big brewers, over a bill to reduce federal excise taxes.

All beer produced and sold in the US is subject to a federal tax of $18 per barrel, with a lower rate of $7 for the first 60,000 barrels for brewers producing fewer than 2 million barrels per year. (Almost every brewery except for the big corporations, Yuengling, and Boston Beer make less than 2 million barrels.)

There are two bills in Congress to reduce the excise taxes for some brewers. The Small BREW Act, supported by the Brewers Association, would cut the tax to $3.50 per barrel for very small breweries producing fewer than 7,143 barrels, then gradually raise the tax as the number of barrels increased, topping out at $18 per barrel for breweries with at least 2 million barrels. But the tax cuts would only apply to breweries producing fewer than 6 million barrels per year.

The Fair BEER Act, supported by the Beer Institute, would structure taxes in a similar way, but doesn’t have the 6 million barrel cutoff — so it would benefit the biggest multinational beer companies as well.

So by bringing Yuengling on board as a “craft brewery,” the Brewers Association isn’t just expanding the definition of craft beer. It’s also expanding its own power, by getting the fourth-biggest brewery in the US on its side.

Correction: An earlier version of this story misspelled the name of the brewery that sent the letter. It’s August Schell.

WATCH: ‘Beer slushie- The best drink you didn’t know existed’

More in Life

Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Advice
8 ways to zone out and relax that don’t involve being on your phone8 ways to zone out and relax that don’t involve being on your phone
Advice

It is possible to shut your brain off without falling into the mindless scrolling trap.

By Julia Ries Wexler
Advice
What trainers actually think about the 12-3-30 workoutWhat trainers actually think about the 12-3-30 workout
Advice

Have we finally unlocked exercise’s biggest secret? Or is this yet another lie perpetrated Big Treadmill?

By Alex Abad-Santos
Politics
Donald Trump’s pivot to blasphemyDonald Trump’s pivot to blasphemy
Politics

Attacking the pope and posing as Jesus — even religious conservatives are mad this time.

By Christian Paz
Explain It to Me
Hope vs. optimism, explainedHope vs. optimism, explained
Podcast
Explain It to Me

A psychology professor makes the case for hope.

By Jonquilyn Hill
Future Perfect
Am I too poor to have a baby?Am I too poor to have a baby?
Future Perfect

How society convinced us that childbearing is morally wrong without a fat budget.

By Sigal Samuel