Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

FCC Boss Wheeler Tells Broadcasters Net Neutrality Is Good for Them

The new rules protect broadcasters from discrimination in reaching an online audience, Wheeler tells conference.

Super Mobility Week/CTIA

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler used the platform of the National Association of Broadcasters show to launch a spirited defense of the new Open Internet rules, even as lawsuits challenging the order pile up in Washington, D.C.

Wheeler sought to build support among the nation’s radio and television broadcasters, arguing that the net neutrality regulations the commission adopted in February will ensure that no one stands in the way of audiences accessing the content they deliver via the Internet.

“The Open Internet order safeguards an increasingly important distribution channel for your most important product — local news and information,” Wheeler said Wednesday in Las Vegas. “It assures that your use of the Internet will be free from the risk of discrimination or hold-up by a gatekeeper.”

Wheeler portrayed the FCC’s net neutrality rules as the 21st century equivalent of the so-called must-carry rules, which require cable television providers in a particular market to carry the signals of local TV stations.

The National Cable & Telecommunications Association, the United States Telecom Association and the CTIA this week all filed lawsuits seeking to overturn the FCC’s net neutrality order. The trade groups are challenging the decision to treat broadband providers like a regulated utility.

The FCC is relying on legal authority Congress granted it under Title II of the Communications Act to impose new rules that forbid both wired and wireless Internet providers from blocking or slowing Internet traffic.

The lawsuits, filed this week, allege the FCC’s actions are “arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of discretion.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram