Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

If Salesforce Sells, ‘It’s Probably Good for Us,’ Oracle CEO Says

“We’re not known to throw around money,” says Safra Catz.

Oracle CEO Safra Catz declined Thursday to answer questions about the possibility that her company might be in talks to acquire Salesforce.com.

But what if Salesforce were to be acquired by Microsoft or maybe IBM? How might that change the strategic map for Oracle?

“If it’s acquired by somebody else, it’s probably good for us, to be honest,” Catz said in a rare press conference at Oracle’s headquarters in Redwood City, Calif. “Everyone brings their own stuff to these things, especially someone big enough to acquire them. … It would be interesting definitely to watch it play out and cause a lot of disruption in that market. I would think that would be helpful to us in the short to medium term.”

She went on: “It would probably depend, but disruption is always an opportunity for the guy who is on-mission.”

Oracle is one of four companies that could realistically contemplate a takeover of Salesforce. Bloomberg reported Wednesday that Salesforce had hired bankers to advise it on incoming offers from an unknown suitor. Other potential buyers include Microsoft and IBM.

While Oracle could conceivably finance a deal for Salesforce, a deal so large — Salesforce’s market capitalization was $44 billion before the reports were published — would be out of character for Oracle. It usually buys smaller companies to enhance its own software offerings.

Catz said Oracle routinely looks at “hundreds of companies, frankly” for possible acquisition and is “not known to throw around money.”

“We’re always looking for deals where one and one adds up to at least two-and-a-half for us because we bring some resources to the table that the seller couldn’t possibly have,” Catz said. “But it’s got to fit our sales force. It’s got to fit our technology. Price is definitely a factor. … We’re buying things all the time, about once a month.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel