Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

401(k)s are failing many Americans. Why not expand Social Security instead?

Dylan Matthews
Dylan Matthews was a senior correspondent and head writer for Vox’s Future Perfect section. He is particularly interested in global health and pandemic prevention, anti-poverty efforts, economic policy and theory, and conflicts about the right way to do philanthropy.

Nowadays, many left-of-center policy types have been wondering whether we should increase Social Security. Former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich makes the case — in cartoon form — in the video above. You can read a transcript here.

The basic issue here is that many Americans aren’t saving enough for retirement. Optimistic assessments say that nearly one-third of Americans ages 66 to 69 don’t have enough saved to maintain their standard of living in retirement. More pessimistic studies argue that fully half of working Americans aren’t saving enough to reach that goal.

And our current system of retirement saving isn’t helping. The move from defined-benefit pensions to employee contribution-based plans like 401(k)s in recent years has introduced a lot of uncertainty into retirement planning. Many Americans have been stuck with high-fee mutual funds that end up eating into their savings.

Expanding Social Security would be a simple option to boost retirement savings. There are already number of proposals in Congress along these lines, including Rep. John Larson’s (D-CT) Social Security 2100 plan and Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) Social Security Expansion Act. Coming soon are plans from Rep. Gwen Moore (D-WI) and Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH). Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is on board. While the details differ, the plans tend to share a few key points:

  • Increasing benefits for current and future retirees by $20 to $70 per month.
  • Adopting CPI-E, an alternate inflation measure focused on goods the elderly buy, which rises faster than the regular inflation rate, enabling bigger cost-of-living adjustments
  • Providing a larger minimum benefit for the poorest workers, to reduce senior poverty
  • Financing it all by taxing some or all wages in excess of the current payroll tax cap ($118,500 a year, currently); some plans also tax high earners’ investment income

These are big changes, especially the financing mechanism, which would increase the marginal tax rates on rich workers by 12.4 percentage points.

One quibble with the video: it’s a little weird to state, as Reich does, that seniors deserve more benefits because they “paid in to Social Security over their lifetimes.” The average worker can already expect to get more back in benefits than they pay into the program already, even before expansion. But if you’re generally a fan of taxing rich people to improve the lot of poorer people, this is the retirement policy for you.

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters