Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Google Bends on Right to Be Forgotten for ‘Revenge Porn’ Search Results

Victims of the incendiary practice can now appeal to expunge sexually explicit images from search.

Lite Productions / Thinkstock

Since its inception, Google has remained stubborn on the sanctity of search. It casts itself as the digital librarian to the entire Web, not the judge and jury of what appears online. As Europe has pressed on the “right to be forgotten” — France is now threatening financial penalties against the company — Google has held steadfast to its opposing stance, its executives frequently citing the countervailing “right to know.”

On Friday, Google bent a bit. The company announced it is now willing to scrub search of “revenge porn,” sexually explicit images that are either stolen or posted online without permission. Google said it will open an online process for submitting removal requests.

“So going forward, we’ll honor requests from people to remove nude or sexually explicit images shared without their consent from Google Search results,” Amit Singhal, Google’s SVP for search, wrote in a blog post. “This is a narrow and limited policy, similar to how we treat removal requests for other highly sensitive personal information, such as bank account numbers and signatures, that may surface in our search results.”

Google joins other Internet behemoths recently moving — albeit at a plodding pace — to make the Web a less hostile place, particularly for women. Reddit placed restrictions on similar vitriolic content in February, followed by Twitter in March.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram