Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Can Facebook Win With Messenger?

Removing the need to maintain an actual Facebook presence might be just the thing to get you to stop using four different messaging apps at once.

Facebook

In a semi-surprising bit of social news, Mark Zuckerberg and company have officially removed the requirement that users of its Messenger app sign up using their Facebook login credentials. At first glance, it seems like a small, relatively innocuous policy change, but if you take a minute to think about it, it just might be the most revolutionary and forward-thinking thing the company has ever done.

It might seem like a few years have gone by, but Messenger has only been officially decoupled from Facebook proper since last April. In the last year, Messenger has shown explosive growth — from 200 million to over 700 million monthly active users. Why change now? Why fix what clearly isn’t broken?

The answer is as simple as it is brilliant: Almost everyone who wants to use Facebook is already using it, so rather than take no for an answer, Facebook is going after the skeptics.

The cool kids

Every few months, we see a new report and a resulting smattering of articles with headlines like “Facebook ‘Not Hip’ Say Youngsters.” The latest study, done by Frank N. Magid Associates Inc., noted that only 88 percent of U.S. 13-to-17-year-olds use it, down from 95 percent just a few years ago. Where did they go? Certainly not to Twitter, where the numbers are even more dismal. They’re mostly using chat applications like Snapchat, Kik and (Facebook-owned) WhatsApp.

If 88 percent of your friends are using Facebook (and Messenger) anyway, removing the need to maintain an actual Facebook presence might be just the thing to get you to stop using four different messaging apps at once.

The privacy people

Since the very moment it became the dominant social network, there has been a small but devoted group of people who have refused all of Facebook’s advances. Under the pretext of privacy concerns, these are the people who take to Twitter to lambast the company for the most minor of TOS changes, the people who championed Ello for a little too long, the people who posted a copyright notice to their Instagram accounts before abandoning the service entirely.

Taking away the need for all that personally identifiable info might counter all those privacy objections, especially once all of your other friends have given up the fight.

The SMS-dependent

It’s sometimes hard to believe, but there are places in the world where Facebook has never really gotten a foothold. Some markets have homegrown alternatives (VK, Sina Weibo, etc.) while others still rely on the aging SMS protocol for real-time communication. For international users with limited service plans, texting can quickly become prohibitively expensive.

A free service that allows you to communicate with anyone, virtually anywhere in the world, is a fantastic introduction to Facebook for people who haven’t yet had the opportunity to use it.


Carmen Sutter is a product manager for Adobe Social, focusing on data collection and campaigns. In her role, Sutter is responsible for the social-monitoring functionality as well as the integration of Adobe Analytics and Adobe Social. She is a board member of the Big Boulder Initiative, the world’s first social-data-focused industry association. Prior to joining Adobe, she led the digital analytics teams at Warner Music Group and Scholastic in New York City. Reach her @c_sutter.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel