Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Sergey Brin to Google Shareholders: Our Moonshots Are Worthwhile

The letter, tucked into an SEC filing, acknowledges his projects’ uncertainty, but defends their necessity.

Google

Google is hosting its annual shareholders meeting on Wednesday morning. In advance of that gathering, co-founder Sergey Brin released a short letter, in an SEC filing, defending some of the audacious, expensive projects he oversees.

His argument is that shareholders consider Google as a research and development company, not merely a search engine or an ad seller.

“We shared a profound belief in the power of technology to make life better for people everywhere and imagined what life could be like 10, 15, 20 years down the road,” Brin wrote. “Nevertheless, now that we are here, I am amazed at the progress and opportunities. For example, I could not have imagined we would be making a computer that fits in a contact lens, with the potential to make life better for millions of people with diabetes.

“Yet, this is something we are working on today.”

He is referencing the Google X smart contact lens initiative, which recently partnered with pharmaceutical giant Novartis. Omid Kordestani, Google’s business boss, also cited this project onstage at the Code Conference as an example of potential revenue models for the moonshot projects.

In his note, Brin mentioned the self-driving car, too. Google’s homemade vehicles are set to hit the road this summer. The autonomous driving project has felt heat from consumer advocates for its accident reports and from investors for its financial worth. “This project,” Brin wrote, “and others like it are very challenging, and the outcomes are far from certain.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Anthropic just made AI scarierAnthropic just made AI scarier
Podcast
Podcasts

Why the company’s new AI model is a cybersecurity nightmare.

By Dustin DeSoto and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol