Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

7 horrifying attempts at building a better mousetrap

Yes, this is an actual mousetrap patent from 1882.
Yes, this is an actual mousetrap patent from 1882.
Yes, this is an actual mousetrap patent from 1882.
Google Patents
Phil Edwards
Phil Edwards was a senior producer for the Vox video team.

“Build a better mousetrap, and the world will beat a path to your door,” or so says the old misquoted aphorism attributed to Ralph Waldo Emerson.

But what happens when the mousetrap is a horrifying, impractical death machine that fails to improve upon the classic? The world flees.

These seven mousetraps are actual issued patents (we’ve added some color, while linking to the original). They show that creating a truly disruptive innovation is a lot harder than it looks.

1) This trap is actually called the “Animal Destroyer”

The Destroyer, for those who want rats to suffer.

How: Lures in a rat and, when it puts weight on a lever, impales it with the other end.

The breakthrough: This 1898 invention boasts about its ability to not only impale but disembowel an animal. The advantage, hinted at in the patent application, is that an animal would pass over the trap, have a hole cut in its body, and leave, and the trap would be ready for its next victim.

2) This trap will whack a mouse across the room like a Wiffle ball

The rat would be flung to the other side of the room.

How: When the rat nibbles a hanging piece of cheese, it triggers a swinging lever, whacking the creature across the room (and hopefully killing it).

The breakthrough: The big idea with this 1889 trap was that other traps smelled like dead animals, which would prevent new rats from being lured in. This inventor hoped that by whacking the rat across the room, the trap could be reused.

3) This trap was cut from a Saw movie

A trap that imprisons and kills a rat.

How: The intended use isn’t to trap the entire animal, but to impale its foot as it reaches for buried bait.

The breakthrough: It’s unclear what the advantage of this 1897 trap would have been, though it probably claimed a better success rate than competitors.

4) Force mice to walk the plank

It looks like fun — until you die!

How: The idea is to lure a mouse or rat onto a ledge, using a piece of cheese. Then gravity lets the ledge snap loose, throwing the animal into a watery grave (where, presumably, it can’t survive). The tub can be filled with water or another liquid.

The breakthrough: Patented in 1932, the device was supposed to fix the problem with springs, which, the patent claims, “not only get out of order but which add to the cost of the ordinary rat trap and which may injure fingers while setting.”

5) This gun is what all mousetraps are leading to

The simplest and deadliest solution.

How: The idea is to shoot the mouse when it steps on a trigger. It’s pretty obvious.

The breakthrough: The putative advantage to this 1882 mousetrap was that it could help catch animals that burrowed into the ground, and it also told you — through the sound of a gunshot — when it needed to be reset. In the picture, the mouse is in a burrow, though it could conceivably work for any rat nest.

6) This automatic rat trap could destroy an entire species

It's frightening to look at.

How: This trap would lure in a rat, capture it, and then shoot it out again (number 57 is the ejector).

The breakthrough: Patented in 1915, the device could be an automatic rat trap, killing and ejecting rats so it could be ready for another victim. It could operate “continuously as long as the spring power is exerted on the resetting shaft.”

7) This trap would make a mouse a pariah in its own community

What if the mouse ... became the trap!

How: This is the most complex of the “better” mousetraps. The idea is to lure an animal in and then put a bell around its neck. Then when the rat returns to its nest, it will scare away its fellow rats, effectively “exterminating” them.

The breakthrough: Patented in 1908, the design hinges on the idea of rats as “sly and distrustful” enough that a bell would humanely, cheaply, and quickly rid a house of a rat colony through fear alone.

Can you really build a better mousetrap?

Some of these bizarre, vaguely sadistic traps might work better than a traditional mousetrap — but they probably wouldn’t be cheap enough to displace the old standard, and they probably wouldn’t be superior enough to justify any extra cost.

That truth about invention is why business thinker Clayton Christensen’s gospel about disruption rings true for a wide range of businesses, as well as plain old mousetraps: “Build a worse mousetrap, and the world will beat a path to your door.”

More in Life

Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Advice
8 ways to zone out and relax that don’t involve being on your phone8 ways to zone out and relax that don’t involve being on your phone
Advice

It is possible to shut your brain off without falling into the mindless scrolling trap.

By Julia Ries Wexler
Advice
What trainers actually think about the 12-3-30 workoutWhat trainers actually think about the 12-3-30 workout
Advice

Have we finally unlocked exercise’s biggest secret? Or is this yet another lie perpetrated Big Treadmill?

By Alex Abad-Santos
Politics
Donald Trump’s pivot to blasphemyDonald Trump’s pivot to blasphemy
Politics

Attacking the pope and posing as Jesus — even religious conservatives are mad this time.

By Christian Paz
Explain It to Me
Hope vs. optimism, explainedHope vs. optimism, explained
Podcast
Explain It to Me

A psychology professor makes the case for hope.

By Jonquilyn Hill
Future Perfect
Am I too poor to have a baby?Am I too poor to have a baby?
Future Perfect

How society convinced us that childbearing is morally wrong without a fat budget.

By Sigal Samuel