Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

JDate claims to own the concept of connecting 2 people based on mutual attraction

JSwipe wants to help Jewish couples fall in love, but JDate isn’t making it easy.
JSwipe wants to help Jewish couples fall in love, but JDate isn’t making it easy.
JSwipe wants to help Jewish couples fall in love, but JDate isn’t making it easy.
Cari

JDate, the leading site for Jewish dating, recently sued JSwipe, a mobile dating app for Jews that works like Tinder. Most media coverage has focused on mocking JDate for essentially claiming that it has a monopoly on certain uses of the letter J.

But in some ways, the part of JDate’s lawsuit that really merits mockery is the patent infringement claims. JDate is suing JSwipe for infringing a broad patent that essentially claims the concept of using a computer to match pairs of users who express interest in each other. The lawsuit illustrates the continuing need for patent reform, because the current system makes it too expensive for defendants to challenge dubious patents.

JSwipe is accused of infringing a broad patent

“This is not about us discouraging market competition,” Michael Egan, CEO of the company behind JDate, wrote to the New York Observer’s Brady Dale. “Our case against JSwipe is about their theft of our technology.”

Patent plaintiffs like to talk about defendants’ “theft of our technology” because it makes it sound like the defendant did something nefarious, like hacking into a competitor’s servers to steal their source code. But there’s no evidence in JDate’s lawsuit that JSwipe did anything remotely like that.

Instead, JDate accuses JSwipe of infringing a US Patent No. 5,950,200. The patent claims the concept of using a computer to notify people that “they feel reciprocal interest for each other” by first “receiving input” from users about who they’re interested in and then notifying pairs of users if each expresses interest in the other. So when JDate accuses JSwipe of technology theft, what the company means is that JSwipe built an online service that introduces people based on mutual interest.

It’s really difficult to undo a patent — even if the patent is ridiculous

In theory, a recent Supreme Court ruling was supposed to rein in abstract software patents like this. Patents are supposed to claim specific technologies, not abstract concepts, and the Supreme Court’s 2014 CLS Bank v. Alice decision made clear that implementing an abstract concept (like “introduce two people if they’re both interested in each other”) on a computer doesn’t turn it into a patentable invention.

The problem is that once the patent office issues a patent, it’s very hard to get rid of it — even if later court decisions make clear that it shouldn’t have been granted in the first place. In many cases, the only way to get rid of a bad patent is to win a lawsuit. But these challenges take years and cost hundreds of thousands — if not millions — of dollars. So even if JSwipe is legally in the right, it might not have enough money to prevail.

JSwipe has launched an Indiegogo campaign to raise the money it will need to defend itself in court. JSwipe CEO David Yarus is seeking to raise $180,000, which he estimates is just a fraction of the $300,000 to $500,000 in legal costs JSwipe is facing over the trademark and patent claims. But it would be better if the legal system offered quicker and cheaper ways to test whether a patent is valid.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Anthropic just made AI scarierAnthropic just made AI scarier
Podcast
Podcasts

Why the company’s new AI model is a cybersecurity nightmare.

By Dustin DeSoto and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol