Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Is Health Care Google’s Next Big Business After Search? This Investment Bank Thinks So.

In a research report, Cowen and Company say investors aren’t bullish enough on Google’s medical bets.

Shutterstock

Health is a big deal for Google. Two of its Alphabet companies are devoted to it. One of them, Life Sciences, recently named diabetes as its inaugural area of focus with other widespread diseases to come. Google’s co-founders (and Alphabet chiefs) are obsessed with massive, intractable medical problems.

Yet the company has given minimal disclosures on its nascent, multi-pronged initiatives in health care. Still, one investment bank believes Google’s efforts — which include inventions like its smart contact lens and miniature diabetes monitor, as well as its venture investments — could create its next multi-billion dollar business. In a sizable research note published last week, Cowen and Company wrote that Google’s moves “represent significant unlocked value” that will start becoming clearer as the company separates the finances of Google and Alphabet in the fourth quarter.

“A closer look at Google’s vast health care efforts,” the report says, “reveals that the company is targeting very large markets with an expansive list of projects that with even minor success could justify the company’s recent investments.”

Cowen cites three major trends in the sector that play to Google’s strengths: The digitization of health data; a shift toward paying for care based on value, rather than visits or tests; and genome sequencing. Google’s cloud computing expertise positions it well in the first trend while it has, through the two Alphabet companies, Calico and Life Sciences, begun inking business deals aimed at the other two. In August, Life Sciences signed a partnership with pharmaceutical company Dexcom to make high-tech products for diabetics, a total market Cowen pegs at $20 billion in potential.

Then there are Google’s investments. According to Cowen, Google Ventures currently backs 14 life sciences companies, including two — Flatiron Health and One Medical Group — with valuations over $1 billion. Another, Spruce Health, operates in telemedicine around dermatology, a market Cowen estimates at $5.7 billion.

However, the Cowen report doesn’t attach a headline number to the total basket. Nothing like Google will have a $XX billion healthcare business by 2017. In part, that’s because medical development moves at a glacial pace, with regulatory and research unpredictability. Also, Google isn’t helping.

“It’s just difficult to put numbers around it,” said John Blackledge, a Cowen analyst and report co-author. “It’s always tough with a $400 billion company.”

Cowen did estimate that in the fourth quarter, when Google breaks out its core business results from the Alphabet remainder for the first time, the company will report between $3 billion and $5 billion in research and development costs outside of Google Inc. A huge portion of that will likely go to health care.

Should the digital health and medical tech markets expand, as Cowen and others expect, there’s no guarantee Google-Alphabet will claim a lion’s share of profits. Other tech companies do cloud computing well, arguably better as businesses. And several, including Fitbit and Apple, look better poised to seize on any boom in wearable health products. Also, the success of Calico and Life Sciences will depend on ample pharmaceutical and biotech partners, an industry in the midst of a stock market bloodletting.

Per Cowen, however, Google doesn’t need to own health care as it does with search, but can clean up with some “minor success.”

“We might be early here,” Blackledge said. “Three years from now, if we’re having the same conversation, we may be able to measure it better.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel