Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Sprint Won’t Be Participating in Next Year’s Wireless Auction, Says It Has Plenty of Spectrum

Sprint isn’t exactly flush with cash, and it wants to work with its existing spectrum.

Asa Mathat for Re/code

Earlier this year, the government spent a lot of time convincing TV broadcasters to give up wireless spectrum to cell carriers, who forked over a lot of money for those airwaves. The wireless networks are expected to shell out even more money for more spectrum at the beginning of next year.

Sprint, the fourth-place carrier among the United States’ big four, says it won’t be participating in that auction. In a statement issued Saturday, CEO Marcelo Claure said that “Sprint’s focus and overarching imperative must be on improving its network and market position in the immediate term.”

The auction, which is run by the Federal Communications Commission, is widely viewed as one of the biggest opportunities in years for mobile carriers. However, Sprint, thanks to its 2012 Clearwire acquisition, already has a fair bit of excess spectrum. And the company isn’t exactly flush with cash, because it’s spending heavily to attract new customers; for example, Sprint is heavily marking down new the iPhone 6s by offering customers a $1-a-month leasing plan.

In the statement, Sprint said that it has already “started a major effort to increase coverage and capacity by densifying its network, and increasing the number of cell sites using its existing spectrum.”

“Sprint is already deploying new technologies, such as carrier aggregation, that unlock the potential of its strong 2.5 GHz position,” the statement added.

Does this mean Sprint is tempering its ambition? At the Code Conference in May, Claure said that consumers should expect to see Sprint with the No. 1 U.S. network within 18 to 24 months. So, no, probably not.

Update: T-Mobile CEO John Legere, who likes beating up on Sprint on Twitter (as does Claure on T-Mobile), thinks Sprint isn’t participating for a different set of reasons. Also, the Masa to whom Legere is referring is Masayoshi Son, CEO of Sprint proprietor SoftBank.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Anthropic just made AI scarierAnthropic just made AI scarier
Podcast
Podcasts

Why the company’s new AI model is a cybersecurity nightmare.

By Dustin DeSoto and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol