Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Please Don’t Ask Google ‘Who Runs Hollywood’

Why the robotic “direct answers” in search can surface the underbelly of the Web.

LUNAMARINA / Thinkstock

In recent years, Google has toyed with new ways of doing search, placing bits of information in the results rather than sending searchers outbound with links. Then last year, Google grew more daring. It starting inserting a clean white box above the blue links where it put answers to more complicated queries, culled from the websites it crawls.

Google calls the box “direct answers,” because that is what they are. How do I make French toast? Here are the directions, steps 1, 2 and 3. Who invented French toast? It came from the 15th century court of Henry V, it turns out.

Google being Google, the box is produced by smart algorithms, not humans. Predictably, that can go horribly wrong. On Thursday evening, it did.

A search for “who runs Hollywood” produced a direct answer box and link from a right-wing website denouncing the Anti-Defamation League, a prominent Jewish advocacy group. The writer Josh Fruhlinger first flagged the issue on Twitter.

https://twitter.com/jfruh/status/639673450538266624

At some point Friday morning, Google removed the result.

This issue has always existed for Google. Since the dawn of its search, the company has remained steadfastly agnostic about its search results. So searches for conspiratorial questions — as “who runs Hollywood” is — will product nasty, conspiratorial results. Still, the “direct answers” service smacks users in the face with it much more than the ten blue links do.

We reached out to Google for comment. Here’s what a Google rep told The Guardian: “We assure you that the views expressed by such sites are not in any way endorsed by Google.”

Google ran into similar trouble in June when a search for “what happened to the dinosaurs” prompted a response from a Creationist website. That response is still there, followed by stories about its presence.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Anthropic just made AI scarierAnthropic just made AI scarier
Podcast
Podcasts

Why the company’s new AI model is a cybersecurity nightmare.

By Dustin DeSoto and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol