Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Lawyer of man who threatened Muslims: Fox News made him do it

As legal defenses go, this one leaves a bit to be desired.

California defense attorney Michael Malowney asked a San Diego judge to be lenient in sentencing his client, John David Weissinger, for a series of violent threats against the Council on American-Islamic Relations, because Weissinger was under the influence of alcohol — and Fox News.

Weissinger, to his credit, appeared to stare with open skepticism as his attorney argued that the San Diego man had made the threats following the terrorist attacks on the Charlie Hebdo offices in Paris “after a week of watching Fox News, over and over.” The outrage on the news channel, combined with alcohol and anxiety, Malowney insisted, provoked Weissinger’s threats: “He barks when he’s drunk.”

Weissinger pleaded guilty last year to making the threats against the CAIR office; he also pleaded guilty to a gun charge. The local CBS News affiliate, KFMB, reports that a female victim testified at trial that Weissinger called the local CAIR office and left a voicemail threatening to shoot her and her colleagues. When police later searched his home, they found an illegal assault rifle.

Unsurprisingly, the judge rejected Malowney’s argument that Weissinger was a good man who had been temporarily led astray by the evils of cable news. He denied the defense’s request for leniency and sentenced Weissinger to a year in prison and five years’ probation.

“I was under the influence of Fox News” isn’t a defense. But Islamophobia on cable news is indeed out of control.

Let’s be absolutely clear: Weissinger is responsible for his own actions. It would be absurd to suggest that Fox News was somehow the primary cause of his criminal actions, or that his threats were an inevitable result of Fox’s coverage.

But the fact that Malowney even thought this argument had a shot suggests the degree to which Fox News, and cable TV more broadly, is seen as stirring up Islamophobia. As Max Fisher has covered extensively for Vox, Islamophobia is rampant on American cable news in general. But the Fox News coverage in the week following the Charlie Hebdo attacks featured truly breathtaking levels of anti-Muslim hatred.

The channel devoted multiple segments to the totally false claim that there were Muslim-run “no-go zones” in Europe where immigrants had imposed hard-line Sharia law. Fox host Jeanine Pirro delivered an unhinged seven-minute monologue in which she called for the mass murder of Islamists.

“We need to kill them. We need to kill them,” she said. “Our job is to arm those [non-Islamist] Muslims to the teeth, give them everything they need to take out these Islamic fanatics, let them do the job, and when they do, we need to simply look the other way.”

The message was delivered clearly and relentlessly: Muslims are dangerous. They threaten this country and liberal democracies around the world. Something must be done.

That is a problem regardless of whether it actually provokes unhinged criminals like Weissinger to threaten terrorist violence.

Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
These reforms could transform criminal justice for people — and they cost almost nothingThese reforms could transform criminal justice for people — and they cost almost nothing
Future Perfect

Crime is falling to historic lows. This economist knows how to make it plunge even faster.

By Bryan Walsh
Podcasts
The influencer circus around Nancy Guthrie’s homeThe influencer circus around Nancy Guthrie’s home
Podcast
Podcasts

Are they harming the investigation — or just doing the same thing as CNN?

By Kelli Wessinger and Sean Rameswaram
Policy
The Supreme Court appears likely to let stoners own gunsThe Supreme Court appears likely to let stoners own guns
Policy

Gun lovers may soon have the right to bear bongs.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
The Supreme Court will decide if marijuana users may be barred from owning gunsThe Supreme Court will decide if marijuana users may be barred from owning guns
Policy

Do stoners have a right to bear arms?

By Ian Millhiser