Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Obama says the U.S. government still doesn’t know who shut down the internet last week

Policy makers are starting to ask questions.

Obama Outlines Policy For Open And Free Internet
Obama Outlines Policy For Open And Free Internet
Michael Bocchieri / Getty Images

It’s still unclear who is responsible for Friday’s massive internet outages, according to President Obama.

The attack was comprised of hundreds of thousands, possibly millions, of internet-connected devices that sent junk traffic to Dyn, a major domain name service provider.

Major sections of the internet across the United States were down for hours.

Basic security flaws found in webcams and other internet-connected recording devices were compromised in the attack, according to Chinese device manufacturer Hangzhou Xiongmai Technology, which admitted its products were partially to blame. A recall of Hangzhou Xiongmai products has been initiated. But other IoT device makers were targeted, too.

Still, no one seems to know who perpetrated it. And it may take weeks to find out.

”We don’t have any idea who did that,” said President Obama last night on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” in reference to the internet outage.

No matter who is responsible, security researchers say the attacks, dubbed Mirai, foreshadow a future where internet threats stemming from our increasingly networked lives — with household IoT devices and connected cars — could become commonplace.

Yet the global economy depends on a reliable internet, and measures to prevent attacks that are as crippling as last Friday’s, where websites like Twitter, Netflix and the New York Times are shut down, need to be taken.

Lawmakers in D.C. are starting to chime in. Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said Monday that the Mirai malware attack had largely been “mitigated” and that Homeland Security has “been working to develop a set of strategic principles for securing the Internet of Things, which we plan to release in the coming weeks.”

Also Monday, Senators Angus King, I-Maine, and Martin Heinrich, D-NM, urged the Obama Administration to establish government policies to secure U.S. networks by sharing known vulnerabilities with industry.

Another Senator, Mark Warner, D-Va., sent letters asking the Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission if the agencies are prepared to grapple with the looming threat of millions of infected electronic devices.

Federal regulation, however, takes years. And poorly written legislation has the potential to codify into federal law practices that may rapidly become outdated. Various industry groups are moving to create guidelines for certifying the security of IoT products, like the IoT Security Foundation and the Open Connectivity Foundation. But these processes have yet to yield industry-wide standards.

Part of the problem is that no single agency or entity regulates the security of the internet. Individual websites are supposed to invest in their own security.

But the coming of 5G in 2020 is also supposed to usher in a new wave of connected devices. Cisco predicts that by 2020 there will be 50 billion internet-connected devices worldwide, up from 15 billion online today, and that means securing the internet is going to become even more critical and a whole lot more complicated.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram