Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Internet providers now need permission to share or sell your web browsing data

But that’s easy to obtain.

Federal Communications Commission Set To Vote On Net Neutrality
Federal Communications Commission Set To Vote On Net Neutrality
Mark Wilson / Getty Images

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission has finalized groundbreaking new rules that force all internet providers, like Verizon, Comcast and AT&T, to obtain explicit consent from subscribers before selling data about online behavior to third-party marketers.

That includes information about what websites you visit, mobile location information, app usage and other potentially sensitive details inadvertently collected in the course of using the internet at home or on a smartphone.

The FCC rules don’t affect the way platforms like Google and Facebook use personal data for targeted advertising. Rather, companies that provide internet access are treated differently from websites, in that they are providing a utility as defined by the network neutrality rules passed last year.

While the new ISP privacy rules are viewed by public interest advocates as a win for consumers, it’s still not clear how effective the regulations will be.

That’s largely because the current way online businesses notify and gain consent to collect user data is via privacy policies or license agreements that usually amount to long, arduous blocks of text which everyone routinely clicks “Agree” to get past and ignores.

If ISPs are able to fulfill the consent requirement this way, people may very well agree to data collection about their internet behavior without fully realizing what they’re agreeing to.

Still, broadband providers aren’t happy and would rather collect and use customer data without restriction.

“There is no sound reason to subject broadband providers to a different set of rules than other Internet companies,” said AT&T in a comment sent to the FCC, claiming broadband providers will be prevented from engaging in the lucrative digital advertising game.

AT&T announced plans to merge with Time Warner last weekend with the hope of expanding its online advertising operations, which could be affected by the new FCC rules.

Yet Google, which is scaling back its fiber program and totally dominates the online ad industry, also opposed the rules. In its comments to the FCC, Google said data ISPs collect about browsing history shouldn’t require opt-in consent from subscribers; the company doesn’t believe web browsing data contains sensitive information.

Still, the FCC rules are final. And if internet providers want to oppose them, they’ll have to take the agency to court.

Here are the basics of the new rules:

  • ISPs need to get consent, somehow, from subscribers before using or selling their sensitive data — browsing history, app usage, location information, financial data — to third parties like online advertisers.
  • ISPs do not need permission from subscribers to share non-sensitive information, which includes IP addresses, email addresses, service tiers or bandwidth usage. But internet providers must create a way for subscribers to opt out of sharing that information if they so chose.
  • The new rules don’t require internet companies to gain consent to advertise other communications services they provide. So if Verizon wanted to market its home broadband service to a current mobile user, that would be fine. If Verizon wanted to share browsing data with other parts of the company that do not provide communications services, like Yahoo, it would have to get consent. And there’s no requirement to provide a way to opt out of internal marketing.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel