Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Trump supporters can’t use ‘diversity of opinion’ as a defense for his harmful speech

If you have not yet voted, please vote for inclusion today.

Thos Robinson / Getty

A version of this essay was published on Medium.


“What about diversity of opinion?”

That question has been a common response to our real fear for our and for others’ safety from the hate- and fearmongering of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. Those who ask often define inclusion as requiring all people and views to be included —  regardless of how they promote excluding others. We at Project Include find this definition offensive and reject it.

Trump is uniquely harmful, because his actions are beyond political speech — he actively promotes and fosters hate and violence.

This is what that hate and violence look like:

This is how his supporters respond with hate.

This is happening even in progressive places:

Trump judges people by race, ethnicity, religion or gender and encourages his followers to attack groups based on biases. He has called Mexicans rapists and criminals, discouraged black renters, bragged about grabbing women’s genitals, advocated banning Muslims and encouraged physical violence.

The “diversity of opinion” argument comes with calls for change, for less government, for freedom of speech. We believe that safety, inclusion and freedom from hate and violence are fundamental rights and need to be part of that new world.

As a society, we cannot have a productive dialogue around your “diverse opinions” if you do not respect us  —  our opinions and our identities  —  and instead threaten us.

Project Include’s focus is diversity and inclusion. Diversity and inclusion go hand in hand, and productive diversity of opinion cannot be based on principles of exclusion. We applaud the many others who have also expressed this view.

If you have not yet voted, please vote for inclusion today.


Ellen K. Pao is the co-founder of Project Include, an open community working toward providing meaningful diversity and inclusion solutions for tech companies. A former partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, she was also former interim CEO at Reddit. She can be reached on Twitter @ekp.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel