Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

What Went Wrong With FanDuel’s Football Season Advertising Blitz?

FanDuel CEO: We may have gone overboard.

FanDuel spent the better part of last fall spending its newly claimed investor money on television ads with any network that would take it — which, for the uninitiated, is every TV network out there.

The company, which offers cash prizes for daily fantasy sports competitions, was racing for market share against rival DraftKings and Yahoo, plus potential competitors like ESPN. So it spent money. Millions and millions and millions of dollars.

“Someone said earlier that TV advertising doesn’t work. It does work for us. Very well,” said FanDuel CEO Nigel Eccles, who spoke Thursday at Re/code‘s annual Code/Media conference at The Ritz-Carlton, Laguna Niguel in Dana Point, Calif. “In terms of talking to our audience, it was great.”

But FanDuel learned a few things, too. Like, for example, more does not always mean better.

“There’s nothing more interesting in life than your fantasy football team, but there’s nothing less interesting in life than your buddy’s fantasy football team,” Eccles said. “I think what we did was we reminded you about your buddy’s fantasy football team every fifteen seconds for several months.”

The salt in the wound is that the ads created a lot of attention for the industry from people it didn’t want to attract, like regulators. DraftKings was also spending like crazy, which didn’t help. So did the marketing campaign lead to all of the industry’s regulatory issues?

“Possibly, yeah,” said Eccles. “We put it on the radar.”

All of this means that, assuming FanDuel is still around come football season, the company will make a few changes to its marketing strategy. “We’re definitely going to market differently,” Eccles said. “We’re definitely going to spend differently, it probably won’t be as much.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel