Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Affirm CEO Max Levchin Wants Apple to Open the iPhone -- But Just This Once

That’s a mighty thin line you’re walking, Mr. Levchin!

Asa Mathat

That’s a mighty thin line you’re walking, Mr. Levchin!

Max Levchin, the Affirm CEO and Paypal founder, was interviewed by Charlie Rose Friday night and shared a somewhat surprising stance on Apple’s legal battle with the FBI. Levchin said he wants Apple to help government officials gather data from a locked iPhone that was used by terrorists responsible for a mass shooting in San Bernardino, Calif., back in December. This is the opposite viewpoint of many of Silicon Valley’s other prominent tech leaders, including Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Google CEO Sundar Pichai.

“I ultimately hope that this propels its way to the Supreme Court very quickly, and the Supreme Court actually tells Apple, ‘You are compelled to open this phone up,’ Levchin said during the interview. “I personally want to see this case in front of the FBI with every bit of evidence so that they have access to whatever information they need to make sure my kids are safe.”

Buuut … there’s a catch. Levchin wants Apple to help just this once, and has a plan for how to avoid setting a precedent for companies breaking through their own security measures at every government request. It hinges on the recent death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and the unusual political situation his absence causes.

“We have a four against four court, which means it doesn’t set precedent,” he explained. “The court can compel Apple to open this one phone, and then it still goes in front of Congress. And we still have the public debate, and we still fundamentally decide what society would want to be.”

Well. That’s one scenario. Here’s a look at the interview snippet from Charlie Rose.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WweeBQQZxo&feature=youtu.be

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel