Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A Google self-driving car has finally caused an accident

Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Until this month, Google could boast that its self-driving cars had logged more than a million miles without causing a single accident. Google’s cars had been involved in a few accidents, but all of them had been the fault of the other driver — often a car rear-ending the Google car.

But on Valentine’s Day, Google suffered the first accident where one of its self-driving cars was at least partially to blame.

Here’s what happened, according to Google’s official report to California regulators. The Google car was driving in the rightmost lane as it approached an intersection, but it encountered a sandbag blocking its path and had to stop. The car tried to merge into the slow-moving traffic on its left to get around the sandbag. It tried to merge in front of a bus, expecting the bus to slow and let it in. But the bus kept moving, and the Google car hit the side of the bus, damaging “the left front fender, the left front wheel, and one of the driver’s side sensors.”

Obviously this isn’t great news for Google, which doubtless enjoyed being able to boast that its cars had never caused an accident. But as accidents go, this one seems pretty minor.

Google estimates that the bus was moving 15 miles per hour at the time of the crash, while the Google car was traveling 2 miles per hour. No one was injured.

And if Google’s description is accurate, it sounds like the kind of mistake humans often make: misjudging the likely reaction of another human driver.

On the other hand, the public isn’t likely to accept self-driving cars that are merely as good as their human competitors. To convince customers to let computers drive them around, Google is going to have to design cars that drive much better than a human being would — and we just don’t have enough data yet to be sure whether self-driving cars are safer overall. So the Mountain View company still has some work to do.

(Hat tip to Kevin Roose.)

Disclosure: My brother is an executive at Google.

See More:

More in Technology

Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram