Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Apple to Pay $450 Million E-Book Settlement After Supreme Court Waves Off Case

The U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear Apple’s appeal of the lower court’s ruling.

Asa Mathat

The Supreme Court declined Monday to review an appeals court decision that Apple conspired with book publishers to hike the price of e-books, a decision that means Apple must pay a $450 million settlement.

The high court offered no explanation for refusing to hear Apple’s appeal.

That means Apple must abide by the terms of a 2014 settlement to pay $400 million to as many as 23 million e-book consumers who were harmed by Apple’s price-fixing conspiracy with five big book publishers. The company will pay another $50 million to the states and in legal fees.

Apple had argued that the introduction of the iBooks bookstore — which was announced with the 2010 debut of the iPad — resulted in more competition in the market for digital books and benefitted authors, publishers and consumers.

“Following Apple’s entry, output increased, overall prices decreased and a major new retailer began to compete in the market formerly dominated by a single firm,” Apple argued in its petition for Supreme Court review.

The appeals court had rejected that argument, saying the arrangement between Apple and the book publishers served to eliminate price competition by allowing publishers to set e-book prices.

Apple co-founder Steve Jobs’s own words were used against the company. On one occasion, he had told James Murdoch, then head of a News Corp division that included one of the world’s largest book publishers, HarperCollins, that Amazon’s $9.99 sales were “eroding the value perception” of its products and that Apple would be trying higher price points.

Apple could not immediately be reached for comment.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel