Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Michael Bloomberg Will Not Run for President in 2016

The former New York mayor says he could win a few states, but not enough to win the office.

Getty Images

Mike Bloomberg, the three-term mayor of New York City and financial data and media billionaire, will not be a candidate for president in the 2016 election.

Bloomberg, who has been the subject of repeated speculation about a run as a third-party candidate who might derail the campaign of Republican front-runner Donald Trump, announced his decision not to seek America’s highest elective office in an editorial on the Bloomberg View website.

“I’ve always been drawn to impossible challenges, and none today is greater or more important than ending the partisan war in Washington and making government work for the American people — not lobbyists and campaign donors,” Bloomberg wrote. “But when I look at the data, it’s clear to me that if I entered the race, I could not win.”

Bloomberg had briefly fired up the hopes and dreams of the tech cognoscenti, who hoped his data-driven technocratic approach would resonate with enough voters nationally to at minimum avert a Trump presidency.

True to his core, for Bloomberg it all came down to simple numbers — specifically, the number of electoral votes needed to win the election outright: “I believe I could win a number of diverse states — but not enough to win the 270 Electoral College votes necessary to win the presidency.”

Instead, he said, he might win enough electoral votes to deny an electoral majority to anyone, and thus throw the race to the U.S. House of Representatives, which under the Constitution decides the election when there’s no clear electoral majority. The prospect of an election not decided by the people, he argued, was too risky: “Party loyalists in Congress — not the American people or the Electoral College — would determine the next president.”

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel