Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Penis Size, Reality TV and a Sex Tape: Highlights From the Gawker-Hulk Hogan Trial

No, we’re not talking about the next Republican candidates debate.

Getty and Re/code

For the past two days, Gawker Media and Hulk Hogan have been duking it out in a Florida court over a sex tape featuring Hogan that Gawker published back in 2013.

The stakes are high: Gawker recently took outside investment for the first time, and founder/majordomo Nick Denton directly tied the cash infusion to shoring up the company’s reserves ahead of the trial. Last fall, the New York Times described the $100 million lawsuit brought by Hogan (real name: Terry Bollea) as an “existential crisis” for the company.

If the jury rules in Hogan’s favor*, will it set a dangerous legal precedent for what journalists can and can’t publish? Or does it just set a standard of decency for media companies that publish graphic sexual material without consent of the subjects? Heady stuff!

Fortunately, there’s going to be no shortage of Monday morning quarterbacking over the jury’s ruling, which could come by the end of the week. Until then, there will be, and already has been, ample testimony from Hogan himself, as well as from current and former Gawker editors. Here are some of the highlights of what’s happened thus far, courtesy of journalists covering the trial:

https://twitter.com/annamphillips/status/707245517433131009

https://twitter.com/annamphillips/status/707249294965907457

https://twitter.com/annamphillips/status/707249742099685377

https://twitter.com/kbsmoke/status/707250131293310976

https://twitter.com/kbsmoke/status/707275331334443009

https://twitter.com/TomKludt/status/706936227472285697

https://twitter.com/ProfJeffJarvis/status/707342218030223360

https://twitter.com/kbsmoke/status/707322982738370560

* This is an outcome that Denton and analysts have said is likely, although it would almost surely be reversed after an appeal.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram