Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Former Editor’s Sarcastic Reply Takes Center Stage at Gawker-Hulk Hogan Trial

A.J. Daulerio’s comment was “flip” but may hurt the case.

YouTube

Hulk Hogan’s lawsuit against Gawker Media for publishing a sex tape of the retired wrestler in 2012, whose trial is currently taking place in Florida, continues to produce headline-making material.

For example, in a videotaped deposition shown in court Wednesday, ex-Gawker.com editor A.J. Daulerio was asked by attorneys for Hulk Hogan what he felt was the cutoff age for newsworthiness for a celebrity sex tape.

Daulerio’s sarcastic reply: “Four.”

The sharp exchange, recorded last April, stood out on a day filled with generally drier testimony from a Hulk Hogan lawyer, a journalism expert and the screening of a 2013 deposition tape featuring Gawker boss Nick Denton.

Hogan lawyer David Houston took the stand to give more detail on the cease-and-desist letter that he sent to Gawker after Daulerio released the video, and University of Florida journalism professor Mike Foley questioned some of Gawker’s decision-making in the course of publishing the sex tape.

Denton’s deposition touched on his thoughts on free speech and Gawker Media’s journalistic ethics. Both Daulerio and Denton are expected to take the stand when called by the defense in coming days.

The Daulerio exchange stood out, however, prompting Gawker Media to issue a direct response explaining that the ex-editor’s reply was sarcastic and not what he actually thought.

A copy of the statement provided to Re/code says that “[Daulerio] just said in the prior answer [of the deposition tape] that he wouldn’t post a tape of a child and when the question was repeated he obviously made the point in a flip way because his answer was already clear.”

Daulerio left Gawker in 2013 and later founded the online tabloid Ratter, which was backed in part by Gawker Media and Mark Cuban. In January, Daulerio said he was suspending Ratter’s publication until after the Hogan trial was finished.

https://twitter.com/TomKludt/status/707586055516635136

https://twitter.com/annamphillips/status/707589861839081472

https://twitter.com/davidbix/status/707327637983764481

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram