Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Time Warner makes livestreaming bet, invests in Kamcord

The funding values the company at more than $100 million.

Snowman Games

Facebook and Twitter aren’t the only two companies interested in livestreaming.

Kamcord, a livestreaming app that lets users broadcast the contents of their phone screen, has raised $10 million in a new funding round led by Time Warner. The funding values the company at more than $100 million, according to co-founder Aditya Rathnam. Tencent, TransLink Capital, XG Ventures, Plug & Play Ventures and Wargaming also participated in the round.

Kamcord does things differently from Facebook Live or Twitter’s Periscope, which both let people broadcast from the camera on their smartphone. Kamcord, on the other hand, lets you broadcast what’s actually on your phone screen, which makes it popular for mobile gamers and those who like to watch people play mobile games. (Yes, people like watching other people play video games online — just ask Twitch.)

The gaming element is one of the reasons Time Warner was interested in Kamcord. Time Warner-owned Turner is launching a televised eSports league, and while no official partnerships have been set in stone, Kamcord would make an obvious companion, says Rachel Lam, the group managing director of the Time Warner Investments group.

As part of the deal, Lam is joining Kamcord’s board of directors.

There’s one other key difference between Rathnam’s product and its more popular competitors: Kamcord actually pays its broadcasters. People who watch a Kamcord stream can pay money to send the creator “virtual goods,” essentially a donation that is then split between the company and the broadcaster.

The hope is that paying creators — something Facebook does for a few high-profile broadcasters but Periscope has never done — will lure media personalities who currently post videos on YouTube, says Rathnam.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel