Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

It’s 2016, so Twitter will make it easier to cram photos and links into tweets

The 140-character limit stays, though.

Bill Pugliano / Getty Images
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

The Twitter biggification is coming.

Jack Dorsey and company are going to make it easier for users to stick more stuff in their tweets.

Not by dropping the service’s famous 140 character limit — an idea the company had previously floated — but by expanding it, in a way: Twitter won’t count the characters used to insert photos, links or other media into tweets against the 140 character limit.

Bloomberg says the change “could happen in the next two weeks,” citing a person who would know. I talked to one of those people, and they didn’t argue with the report.

Now imagine I wrote some boilerplate text about Twitter needing to make changes to its product to make it easier to use, so that its growth rate will stop flagging. Good? Okay.

But the fact that this story is a story, in 2016, tells you how reluctant Twitter has been, over the course of many years and many executives, to make even slight changes to its product.

There’s absolutely no reason for the company to keep the 140-character limit anymore — it’s an artifact of Twitter’s birth as an SMS service, in an era when smartphones were still rare. And even if Twitter does like the idea of the forced concision that the limit requires, it could have instituted this change a long time ago.

Now: Cue tweets from Twitter users who think the change will hurt the platform.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel