Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Meg Whitman’s five-year plan to fix Hewlett-Packard by breaking it up cost a lot of jobs

It was big nasty job, and lots of eggs got broken along the way.

Hewlett Packard CEO Meg Whitman Rings NYSE Opening Bell
Hewlett Packard CEO Meg Whitman Rings NYSE Opening Bell
Photo by Andrew Burton/Getty Images

Hewlett Packard Enterprise surprised a lot of people yesterday with a massive deal to spin off its Enterprise Services business unit and merge it with IT services firm Computer Sciences Corp.

The two companies revealed a lot of impressive figures: The new outfit will boast annual revenue of about $26 billion and will have 5,000 clients in 70 countries. After the spinoff, HPE will have about $32 billion in annual revenue.

But there’s one metric that neither company talked about yesterday: The number of jobs that will be affected. No cuts were announced, but you can bet there will be some before the combination is complete.

On CNBC today, CEO Meg Whitman said that, after the spinoff, HPE will have somewhere between 50,000 and 60,000 people. Separately, a spokesman told Recode that about 100,000 jobs will move from HPE to the new CSC-led company.

The number of announced jobs cut on Whitman’s watch add up to more than 85,000, about 25 percent of the total number of employees at HP when she began, about 350,000 worldwide.

And while she will be remembered for fixing deeply-seated problems at one of America’s most storied Silicon Valley icons by essentially breaking it into three more valuable pieces, it’s only fair to note the pain caused by job losses along the way.

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel