Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Google denies it is secretly helping Hillary Clinton with its search results

A plot straight from “House of Cards.”

The Smithsonian And Netflix Host A Portrait Unveiling And Season 4 Premiere Of ‘House Of Cards’
The Smithsonian And Netflix Host A Portrait Unveiling And Season 4 Premiere Of ‘House Of Cards’
Paul Morigi / Getty

This is unusual.

When faced with allegations that Google is jiggering its search results, the company typically issues a curt statement or stays silent, waiting for the controversy to fizzle.

Instead, late on Friday, Google issued a blog post detailing how its autocomplete function works in search. It didn’t say so explicitly, but the post is a direct rebuttal to claims — surfaced by a site on Thursday — that the function buries more damning search results for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, thereby aiding her electoral odds.

Google denied it initially, but felt it necessary to add more after the claims drew considerable attention online and in political quarters. (Donald Trump was alarmed.)

Here’s Tamar Yehoshua, the Google VP who runs that search feature:

The autocomplete algorithm is designed to avoid completing a search for a person’s name with terms that are offensive or disparaging. We made this change a while ago following feedback that Autocomplete too often predicted offensive, hurtful or inappropriate queries about people.

The short post concludes with a note, addressed to us web searchers, “that your trust is what keeps you using Google.”

It’s doubtful that the incident will send people en masse to Bing. But Google is particularly concerned about these sorts of claims, in no small part because the contested (frankly bizarre) 2016 electoral politics have given the notion that Silicon Valley shows its political stripes through its products serious legs.

Fiction doesn’t help. The situation Google faces is nearly identical to a central plot line in the fourth season of Netflix’s “House of Cards.” (So I am told; I’ve only made it through the first season. No spoilers!)

This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel