Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

One tweet that perfectly sums up where Donald Trump has brought the Republican Party

JOSH EDELSON/AFP/Getty
Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He’s worked at Vox since the site’s launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker’s Washington, DC, bureau.

Again and again, Donald Trump has said and done things that can really only be described as flat-out racist. He’s referred to Mexican immigrants as criminals and “rapists.” He’s called for a ban on Muslim travel to the US. And now he’s said that Judge Gonzalo Curiel should be disqualified from overseeing a Trump University case simply because of his “Mexican heritage.” Plus, there was that period when he repeatedly questioned whether President Obama was born in the United States.

Indeed, Trump’s racism has now become so unmistakable that leading Republicans are no longer even trying to deny that it exists. Instead, they’ve moved to acknowledging it and condemning it — but maintain that Trump is worth supporting anyway. That was House Speaker Paul Ryan’s argument Tuesday morning, according to the Washington Post’s Mike DeBonis:

This is the position Republican elites have put themselves in: arguing that despite Trump’s racism, he should still be the next president of the United States because of his views on other policy issues. That Trump’s racism is an unfortunate thing but something they’re willing to live with. That opposition to racism is no longer a bedrock value of the Republican Party but rather something that can be compromised away.

This might strike some as incoherent, but it’s arguably clarifying. After all, Republican voters overwhelmingly believe that “discrimination against whites has become as big a problem as discrimination against blacks and other minorities,” according to the Public Religion Research Institute’s American Values Survey:

Over the past few years, Republican elites have repeatedly attempted to get the party to move to the center on issues like immigration and change the party’s tone, to better win over Hispanic voters. “If Hispanics think we do not want them here, they will close their ears to our policies,” several leading Republicans wrote in the Republican National Committee’s 2013 “autopsy report.”

Elites hoped that a Latino politician like Marco Rubio — or one who engaged in a great deal of outreach to Hispanics, like Jeb Bush — would win the 2016 nomination.

But the party’s voters have repeatedly hammered down these attempts at moderation. When Rubio joined the Senate’s “Gang of Eight” supporting immigration reform, conservative voters were so outraged that he later turned tail and abandoned the effort. And instead of nominating Rubio or Bush, voters turned to the candidate with the harshest anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim rhetoric of all: Donald Trump.

It is clear that GOP voters don’t view bigotry against Hispanic Americans as a particularly big problem in this day and age. And in announcing that he’ll continue to support Trump despite his “textbook” racist comments, Ryan is simply moving where his party’s voters already are — and clarifying the decision the American electorate as a whole faces.


Donald Trump’s rise is a scary moment in America

More in Politics

Politics
The next global Trump ally to fall?The next global Trump ally to fall?
Politics

First the White House lost Orbán. Netanyahu may be next.

By Zack Beauchamp
The Logoff
Trump’s cruel plan for Afghan refugees, briefly explainedTrump’s cruel plan for Afghan refugees, briefly explained
The Logoff

Afghan refugees currently in Qatar could be sent to Congo by the Trump administration.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
The wide-ranging fallout from the Supreme Court’s new terrorism decision, explainedThe wide-ranging fallout from the Supreme Court’s new terrorism decision, explained
Politics

The Court’s Republican majority fractured in a case that could impact everyone from immigrants to consumers.

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide if migrants can be sent back to war zonesThe Supreme Court will decide if migrants can be sent back to war zones
Politics

When can the Trump administration strip legal protections from migrants who risk death in their home countries?

By Ian Millhiser
Politics
The redistricting wars are almost over. Here’s the score.The redistricting wars are almost over. Here’s the score.
Politics

Trump’s gerrymandering efforts are backfiring.

By Christian Paz
The Logoff
Why the Pentagon is dropping a flu vaccine mandateWhy the Pentagon is dropping a flu vaccine mandate
The Logoff

US soldiers are now free to get the flu.

By Cameron Peters