Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Covered, naked, or in between: artist shows how women are scorned regardless of what they wear

This illustration, titled “The Lottery of Indecency,” is as depressing as it is accurate.

Protesters stage ‘Wear What You Want’ demonstration outside the French Embassy in London, England, United Kingdom to show support for Muslim women on August 25, 2016 after 15 French towns introduced and started to enforce a ban on the burkini.
Protesters stage ‘Wear What You Want’ demonstration outside the French Embassy in London, England, United Kingdom to show support for Muslim women on August 25, 2016 after 15 French towns introduced and started to enforce a ban on the burkini.
Protesters stage ‘Wear What You Want’ demonstration outside the French Embassy in London, England, United Kingdom to show support for Muslim women on August 25, 2016 after 15 French towns introduced and started to enforce a ban on the burkini.
| Tolga Akmen/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

“Burkini? A Wetsuit but there’s ‘burk’ in it so it’s forbidden. Undress yourself”

That’s just one part of the text on a powerful illustration by an artist who goes by @LaSauvageJaune on Twitter, which astutely depicts the way women around the world risk scorn and moral judgment for almost any choice they make about their appearance.

Her work was inspired by the “burkini bans” — the relatively new ordinances in about 15 French towns that forbid beachgoers from wearing the full-body swimsuits (essentially wetsuits with hoods) that some Muslim women choose. Those laws became the topic of intense international scrutiny when images circulated this week of a Muslim woman in Nice being confronted by French police, forced to remover her long-sleeved garment, and fined for not “respecting good morals and secularism.”

@LaSauvageJaune’s visual commentary places this in the context of a larger, infuriating pattern, while neither attempts to meet mainstream standards of attractiveness nor extreme modesty are enough to protect women from appearance-based moral judgments and criticism.

Originally in French, the text was translated by Twitter user @Bitofkit and reached an even wider audience this week, resonating with those, like Shireen Ahmed, who said it “illustrates what women endure from those who constantly police our bodies.”

Policy
Pam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerousPam Bondi’s ouster makes Trump’s Justice Department even more dangerous
Policy

The best thing about Bondi was her incompetence.

By Ian Millhiser
Culture
Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?Me Too revealed a lot of villains. Why is Epstein the one we still care about?
Culture

How the Epstein story became an American parable.

By Constance Grady
Future Perfect
These reforms could transform criminal justice for people — and they cost almost nothingThese reforms could transform criminal justice for people — and they cost almost nothing
Future Perfect

Crime is falling to historic lows. This economist knows how to make it plunge even faster.

By Bryan Walsh
Podcasts
The influencer circus around Nancy Guthrie’s homeThe influencer circus around Nancy Guthrie’s home
Podcast
Podcasts

Are they harming the investigation — or just doing the same thing as CNN?

By Kelli Wessinger and Sean Rameswaram
Policy
The Supreme Court appears likely to let stoners own gunsThe Supreme Court appears likely to let stoners own guns
Policy

Gun lovers may soon have the right to bear bongs.

By Ian Millhiser
Policy
The Supreme Court will decide if marijuana users may be barred from owning gunsThe Supreme Court will decide if marijuana users may be barred from owning guns
Policy

Do stoners have a right to bear arms?

By Ian Millhiser