Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Even small reductions in children’s lead exposure could dramatically improve educational outcomes

Picture depicting a blood lead level test
Picture depicting a blood lead level test
Shutterstock

We’ve known for decades that high blood lead levels can lead to lasting learning disabilities and physical health issues.

But now, a new study indicates that even the slightest change of lead in the bloodstream can dramatically impact a child’s educational outcome.

Researchers examined whether housing remediation programs in Rhode Island that removed lead from the home could reduce children’s blood lead levels and improve their performances on standardized tests. They were particularly interested in examining the effectiveness of the remediation programs, as the way in which individual homes were targeted varied and implementation statewide operated on a number of different timelines.

Their findings suggested small changes in lead exposure could have significant effects in both directions. Kids who had just a small increase of lead in their bloodstream (just one microgram, so jumping from 3.1 µg/dL to 4.1 µg/dL, for example), also had reading comprehension skills fall by an entire point.

Similarly, a child’s math skills were negatively impacted as well — the study found the probability of a child lacking proficiency in math increased by 2.1 percentage points.

But for kids whose blood lead levels decreased by a microgram, the study found they performed better on standardized tests and the likelihood of being deficient in reading and math fell.

In other words: A slight increase of lead in blood widens the education gap, but a slight decrease narrows it.

Anna Aizer, one of the study’s authors, has been researching lead exposure for years. In a conversation we had back in February, she told me that disadvantaged children are much more likely to live in older housing and have a higher exposure to lead, which is why comparing the educational outcomes of children with high and low levels of lead in the blood is complicated.

“You can’t just compare the educational outcomes of high and low lead levels,” said Aizer. “It’s complicated to parse out the effect of poverty or race on test scores, but controlling for that, we found that lead still impacts test scores, particularly in the bottom distribution of test scores.”

Read more

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff