Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Balaji Srinivasan, who may run the FDA for Trump, hates the FDA. But Silicon Valley likes Srinivasan.

Just ask Twitter.

TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2013 - Day 2
TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2013 - Day 2
Balaji Srinivasan (left) at a TechCrunch event
Steve Jennings/Getty Images for TechCrunch
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Balaji Srinivasan is a Silicon Valley entreprenuer who had a well-known penchant for mixing it up on Twitter.

Now Srinivasan is reportedly a candidate to run the Food and Drug Administration for Donald Trump. And Srinivasan is apparently done mixing it up on Twitter, which he joined in 2013: He has deleted his old tweets, and has left his 47,500 followers with a single message:

Why would Srinivasan delete his Twitter archive? It would be nice to hear from the man himself, but here’s a reasonable guess: He spent a lot of time criticizing the FDA, and he’d rather pretend those criticisms didn’t exist.

Then again, Srinivasan understands how technology works, so he certainly knows that deleting your tweets doesn’t make them disappear. You can get a sense of what Srinivasan used to tweet about by looking at this Google cache.

And you can get much more specific, courtesy of people who took screenshots of some of his tweets: In short, Srinivasan seems to think the FDA prevents drug companies and startups from innovating by imposing unnecessary regulations.

In 2014, for instance, he argued that a “Yelp for Drugs,” where doctors submitted ratings and patients relayed their experiences, would help sick people more than the FDA.

Last year, he was making the same argument, except this time he used Uber, eBay and Airbnb as his models. Sure, there’s risk involved, he said. But people like extreme sports, too: “If you can skydive or jump off a bridge, you should be free to take an experimental treatment.”

Here’s a more comprehensive archive, courtesy of Christa Peterson.

So Srinivasan seems to have the same view of the agency he might run as other Trump appointees have of the organizations they’re supposed to run: They want them to go away.

But there’s one thing that distinguishes Srinivasan from other Trump nominees: Srinivasan, who runs a Bitcoin startup and co-founded a genetic testing company, has a bunch of fans in Silicon Valley.

That starts with Trump-backer Peter Thiel, but isn’t limited to him. Here’s a Twitter testimonial from investor Ashvin Bachireddy:

And another one from investor Naval Ravikant (that’s Ravikant sitting next to Srinivasan at a 2013 TechCrunch event in the photo at the top of this post):

Seconded by Dilbert creator and Trump fan Scott Adams (really):

And here’s the finale: A blessing from Andreessen Horowitz co-founder Ben Horowitz:

Horowitz’s endorsement of Srinivasan isn’t a shock, since Srinivasan is a board partner at Andreessen Horowitz, which means Srinivasan helps the influential VC firm source deals, and sometimes takes a board seat at some of its portfolio companies.

Still, it’s worth noting: Up until now, tech leaders have been unwilling to endorse any part of the Trump agenda in public.

Srinivasan isn’t formally part of the Trump agenda yet. But you can see how if he gets there, Techland — at least corners of it — could start telling itself that Trumpland might have some upside, after all. They might even start saying it out loud.

Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly named the creator of the Dilbert comic strip.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Podcasts
Anthropic just made AI scarierAnthropic just made AI scarier
Podcast
Podcasts

Why the company’s new AI model is a cybersecurity nightmare.

By Dustin DeSoto and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol