Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A German newspaper estimates 33,293 migrants have died trying to reach Europe since 1993

Der Tagesspiegel counted them all.

Refugees Protest Excessive Waiting Times For Transfer To Germany
Refugees Protest Excessive Waiting Times For Transfer To Germany
Milos Bicanski/Getty Images

Refugees, asylum seekers, and migrants have traveled from Africa and the Middle East in pursuit of the relatively safer harbors of Europe for decades. Unbearably large numbers of them fail to survive that journey. We now have the best estimate to date of just how many have died in the past 24 years: 33,293, including 5,079 who lost their lives in 2016.

Even this number is incomplete, of course, in part because it continues to grow: Nearly 3,000 have perished this year alone. The 33,293 is the tally of those lost trying to reach Europe between 1993 and May 2017, but deaths have continued to mount.

The German daily newspaper Der Tagesspiegel published the number — as well as the details of every death — last week as part of a special insert to the paper. A hundred thousand copies were printed; it was also published as a PDF. They called it the List.

As much as possible, the reporters included information like name, country of origin, date of death, and age. Terribly often those details were impossible to find, especially in cases of mass drownings where the numbers lost stretched into the hundreds.

Sometimes the details are brutal to absorb, like the story of 36-year-old Iraqi migrant Talat Abdulhamid, who died of extreme cold after two days of walking from Turkey to Bulgaria.

The List was compiled by painstaking effort: Researchers pored through reports compiled by the International Organization on Migration, newspaper stories, human rights group documentation, and missives issued by the United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees. The newspaper set out, the editors said, to document how Europe’s border policies had contributed to this enormous loss of life.

It can be difficult to wrap our minds around a number as big as the one compiled by Der Tagesspiegel. It’s why we gravitate towards individual narratives — like the heartbreaking story of 3-year-old Aylan Kurdi, who washed up on a Turkish shore in 2015. His lifeless body became a symbol of destroyed hope and the terrible consequences of the ongoing refugee crisis.

What Der Tagesspiegel is trying to do is make us see the true scope of the horror. The breadth of the problem is best seen visually. The List is 48 pages when printed.

The List was published on a double anniversary

Der Tagesspiegel published the list on November 9, a day doubly resonant for Germans. It’s the day the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, and the 79th anniversary of Kristallnacht, a night of vicious anti-Jewish violence in 1938 that foreshadowed the Holocaust. The parallel was not by accident.

Nevertheless, the day following the publication, reporter Andrea Dernbach noted how terribly incomplete this list remains. “Not included in this count are those who die en route to the Mediterranean coast,” she wrote. “How many perish on the way through the desert, get caught in the shadows in Iraq and Libya, or die from ill-treatment does not, or only exceptionally, come to light when their families report missing.”

“We want to honor them,” Der Tagesspiegel’s editors explained in an introduction to The List, “And at the same time we want to show that every line tells a story ... and that the list keeps getting longer, day by day.”

See More:

More in archives

archives
Ethics and Guidelines at Vox.comEthics and Guidelines at Vox.com
archives
By Vox Staff
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
archives
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
archives
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
archives
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
archives
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff