Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Meet Fortune’s new editor, Clifton Leaf

Questions for the new boss: How do you cover Trump? And what’s going to happen if Time Inc. has new owners?

Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Fortune magazine has a new editor in chief: Clifton Leaf, a veteran of the magazine whose last job was deputy editor, succeeds Alan Murray, who is now running content across all of parent company Time Inc.

Next question: How long will Leaf get to keep that job?

Time Inc. is currently considering offers for all or part of the company, which means Leaf’s job, along with everyone else’s job at the storied magazine publisher, is up in the air.

Leaf’s the wrong guy to ask about that — “we read the news just like everybody else,” he says — but he was happy to answer other questions about his new gig, the future of his magazine and the magazine industry at large.

Peter Kafka: There’s no point in asking you if you’re optimistic about your new job, because you’re supposed to be optimistic.

Cliff Leaf: [Laughs] I am. I’m very optimistic.

But from the outside, the future of storied magazine titles looks fuzzy at best.

Absolutely. If I were writing about this magazine from the outside, I would really think about this as a brand, not just a magazine.

We’ve been exploding on lots of fronts. Our digital platform is growing very well. We’re on track to hit almost 23 million uniques in March [via internal/Omniture], which would be a huge month for us. We’re really hoping to steadily exceed 20 million. We’re going to grow that. And in the conference division, which is a huge part of what we do, and a huge extension of our brand — that part’s been growing like wildfire.

I’m really happy about all that. I think the magazine itself — we just keep churning out good stories and good journalism. I don’t see that ending anytime soon.

If I was thinking honestly about the magazine industry, we’re obviously seeing the decline of print. We’ve seen that across every part of print. Magazines, newspapers, phone books, papyrus scrolls. This isn’t a new story.

But I think there’s still a place for really great print products.

I’ve talked to people who’ve looked at Time Inc.’s business. They think that there’s real value in the brands, but that a new owner would want to cut the employee base significantly [Time Inc. employed more than 7,400 people at the end of last year]. The company has gone through several rounds of cuts over the years. Could you function if you had more cuts?

No, not really. Not with a much, much smaller staff, because I think we’re pretty lean now. We’ve made a lot of cuts — I think we’re in a nice fighting trim now.

Everybody wants more resources. I think certainly we do. But I think that overall, certainly at Fortune, I don’t see us getting much smaller than we do now.

Everyone in media is trying to figure out how to cover Donald Trump, and how much to cover him. How are you thinking about that?

We certainly write about Trump with respect to his impact on business and the economy. But the story of business is much larger than Trump, it’s much larger than the administration, it’s much larger than anything Congress throws out. Whatever the story is, we’ll go tell it.

Any big changes planned for your next six months?

I am really excited about the core storytelling that Fortune has always been famous for. I want to really invest in storytelling.

We’re known for telling great, provocative, thoughtful stories about business. I think what you’ll see is an even more ambitious roster of great stories.

That’s not really a change, though.

I think even more ambitious, and I think some longer things.

I haven’t really sat down to say, “I’m going to change this, I’m going to change that.” I’ve been all of about three hours into the job.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Anthropic just made AI scarierAnthropic just made AI scarier
Podcast
Podcasts

Why the company’s new AI model is a cybersecurity nightmare.

By Dustin DeSoto and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol