Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Time Inc. isn’t selling itself after all, so its stock is down and job cuts are coming

The publisher will sell off some of its titles, though.

Donald Trump Makes Campaign Swing Through Iowa
Donald Trump Makes Campaign Swing Through Iowa
A Time magazine fan shows off a January 2016 edition.
Aaron P. Bernstein / Getty
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Time Inc. says it’s going to be fine on its own. Wall Street disagrees.

The magazine publisher’s shares are down more than 18 percent this morning after it announced it is not going to sell itself, after talking to potential buyers for months.

The fact that Time, whose assets include People, Sports Illustrated and Fortune, didn’t do a deal with rival publisher Meredith Corp. or another suitor is surprising. It will be interesting to figure out the real reason why it didn’t happen.

The fact that Time Inc. shares are down in the wake of the announcement is not surprising: Time traded around $14 up until late last year, when news broke that a group of investors including Edgar Bronfman Jr. had offered $18 a share for the company.

Now, without a sale on the horizon, Time shares are back down below $15.

Meanwhile Time Inc.’s board says it likes a plan laid out by newish CEO Rich Battista, which sounds a lot like the plan some would-be Time Inc. buyers said they would pursue: Focus on exploiting some of the company’s best-known magazine brands in digital and video, and cut costs to account for the company’s declining print business.

That means Time will almost certainly be shrinking its workforce, which various regimes have been cutting for years, but still stood at more than 7,400 people at the end of last year.

“You’re going to see us be smart and aggressive on the cost side,” Battista said in an interview.

And the publisher will also look to sell off some of the 25 titles it operates in the U.S. “We think we want to focus and double down on the core ones,” Battista said, without identifying which ones those are.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Anthropic just made AI scarierAnthropic just made AI scarier
Podcast
Podcasts

Why the company’s new AI model is a cybersecurity nightmare.

By Dustin DeSoto and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol