Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

A federal court will not rehear the telecom industry’s net neutrality challenge

Judges said the FCC under Chairman Ajit Pai plans to gut the rules anyway.

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai Addresses 2017 NAB Show In Las Vegas
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai Addresses 2017 NAB Show In Las Vegas
Ethan Miller / Getty

A U.S. federal court on Monday denied a request by the nation’s telecom giants to rehear arguments challenging the Federal Communications Commission’s net neutrality rules, citing the fact that the agency is now trying to scrap the Obama administration’s work.

In March 2015, the likes of AT&T, Comcast* and Verizon — acting through their Washington lobbying groups — sued the FCC for adopting open-internet protections that subject internet service providers to some of the same regulations that long have applied to traditional telephone companies.

A three-judge panel on the D.C. circuit initially ruled last June in the FCC’s favor, prompting the group, USTelecom, and its allies in the wireless and cable industries to seek a rehearing before the full court.

After a lengthy wait, though, the judges on Monday denied that request, specifically pointing to actions by new FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, who just last week unveiled his plans to eliminate and potentially replace the agency’s net neutrality rules.

For that reason, a rehearing on the rules “would be particularly unwarranted at this point in light of the uncertainty surrounding the fate of the FCC’s Order,” wrote Judges Sri Srinivasan and David Tatel.

“In that light, the en banc court could find itself examining, and pronouncing on, the validity of a rule that the agency had already slated for replacement,” they wrote.

* Comcast, through its NBCU arm, is an investor in Vox Media, which owns this website.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

See More:

More in Technology

Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram