Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

How New York Magazine’s Rebecca Traister convinced Hillary Clinton to start talking

Traister, who profiled Clinton twice for the magazine, talks about how those stories got made on the latest Recode Media.

Hillary Clinton, Code 2017
Hillary Clinton, Code 2017
Lynsey Addario / New York Magazine

Rebecca Traister says she has a rare and lucky job: She gets to do original reporting while also writing about her opinions, and her employer, New York Magazine, lets her write at length, with “historic context.”

That matters because Traister’s beat is gender and politics; on the latest episode of Recode Media with Peter Kafka, Traister said you can’t cover politics without also covering history.

“Everything about our every day — the jobs, education, early childhood education, paid leave, minimum wage, our health insurance, our infrastructure — everything that we live in this country every day is shaped by policy that is influenced by racial and gender inequality,” Traitor said. “And it has been made, historically, nearly exclusively, by white men, who are a minority population in this country.”

Traister, who had been openly critical of or ambivalent toward Clinton in dozens of columns, couldn’t get a phone call returned by Hillary Clinton’s first presidential campaign. But in 2016, with a book about women in the 2008 race on her résumé, she cracked through with a clear pitch: I will write what others are missing.

“I made very clear that the piece I wanted to write was putting [Clinton] in the context of American history,” Traister said. “There was no promise about, ‘It’s going to be good, it’s going to be bad,’ of course. But I did say, ‘This is a crucial historic moment, and I thought there would be more coverage that made careful note of that.’”

“This [was the] first woman nominated by a major party who’s going to run in a major election; the first woman in a 51 percent female nation that purports to be a representative democracy, in 231 years,” she added. “I thought there was going to be more historicizing this moment. [I said] ‘What I’m going to do is put her in the story of America.’ That is what they were signing on for.”

You can listen to the new podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Play Music, Spotify (mobile only), TuneIn, Stitcher and SoundCloud.

That pitch led to Traister’s first interview with Clinton, chronicled in the May 2016 story, “Hillary Clinton vs. Herself.” By coincidence, it was almost exactly one year later that New York Magazine ran Traister’s second profile, about Clinton’s “surreal post-election life.”

On the new podcast, she said she was not one of the reporters asking to speak to Clinton on Nov. 9, partly because she “was in horror for a long time.”

“There are stretches of the fall I don’t remember clearly,” Traister said.

Starting in November, she began collecting thoughts, paragraphs and links to others’ work in a folder on her computer’s desktop, but didn’t pitch Clinton’s team on another story until the following March. In the intervening time, though, several sources from the campaign reached out to talk to her about the fallout.

“In those conversations, I was saying, ‘Obviously, this is a piece I want to write,’” Traister said. “I was saying something reporters don’t usually say, which is, ‘I don’t want to write it now.’ As somebody who has written about Hillary Clinton and loss before, I thought there are periods where these things are so fresh, where you want to go back and look at the dynamics involved; where it’s so fresh that you can’t see it clearly. And my guess in January or February was that it wouldn’t be until at least the spring.”

If you like this show, you should also sample our other podcasts:

If you like what we’re doing, please write a review on Apple Podcasts— and if you don’t, just tweet-strafe Peter. Tune in next Thursday for another episode of Recode Media!


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel