Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

3 senators are demanding an explanation for the Trump voter commission’s colossal screw-up

Lawmakers On Capitol Hill React To President Trump’s Airstrikes In Syria
Lawmakers On Capitol Hill React To President Trump’s Airstrikes In Syria
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH).
Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

Democratic senators are raising questions about a July 13 disclosure from the US presidential commission investigating voter fraud that included more than 100 pages of unredacted comments from the public, including sensitive personal information like names and addresses.

On Monday, Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), and Ron Wyden (D-OR) will send a letter to President Donald Trump asking why the commission publicized so much private information, much of it from citizens critical of the new commission.

“This incident warrants answers from the Administration,” the senators write in their letter, a copy of which was provided to Vox ahead of its release.

They add: “The decision by the White House to publish the emails commenting on the Commission without redacting personal information demonstrates, at best, a lack of sensitivity to and simple disregard for the very concerns raised in many of emails.”

So far, there’s no real evidence to suggest the disclosure was necessarily malicious — that it was motivated by a desire to dox the commission’s political opponents. But Senate Democrats want to understand the underlying explanation for the release and are asking the White House for clarification.

What is the commission?

Beyond its recent disclosure of private information, the commission has proven a political lightning rod in its own right. As Vox’s German Lopez has explained, that’s because it was in part created to solve a problem that doesn’t exist — voter fraud.

As Lopez writes:

...[R]espected research on voter fraud has found again and again that it’s extremely rare in the US. At most, there might be a few hundred fraudulent votes in national elections — in which well over 100 million people can vote.

”The claim that there were millions of illegal voters in this past election is false and unsupported by any credible evidence,” Rick Hasen, a professor of law and political science at the University of California Irvine, wrote. “The National Association of Secretaries of State, made up of the chief election officers of all 50 states, just issued a statement saying so.”

Led by Vice President Mike Pence and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, the voter fraud commission also sent a sweeping request last month for all voters’ names, party IDs, addresses, and the last four digits of their Social Security numbers. A full 44 states rejected at least part of that request.

Senate Democrats’ more targeted request seeks to find out only what led to the disclosure of private information on July 13. “In today’s digital world, where personal information in the wrong hands can lead to unwanted intrusions into people’s lives, we find it particularly concerning that the White House would intentionally release personal information without express consent,” the senators write.

Read the letter in its entirety below:

Brown letter to Trump by Jeffrey Stein on Scribd

See More:

More in Politics

The Logoff
Trump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictionsTrump’s DOJ wants to undo January 6 convictions
The Logoff

How the Trump administration is still trying to rewrite January 6 history.

By Cameron Peters
Politics
Donald Trump messed with the wrong popeDonald Trump messed with the wrong pope
Politics

Trump fought with Pope Francis before. He’s finding Pope Leo XIV to be a tougher foil.

By Christian Paz
Podcasts
A cautionary tale about tax cutsA cautionary tale about tax cuts
Podcast
Podcasts

California cut property taxes in the 1970s. It didn’t go so well.

By Miles Bryan and Noel King
Podcasts
Obama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwupsObama’s top Iran negotiator on Trump’s screwups
Podcast
Podcasts

Wendy Sherman helped Obama reach a deal with Iran. Here’s what she thinks Trump is doing wrong.

By Kelli Wessinger and Noel King
Politics
The Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything elseThe Supreme Court could legalize moonshine, and ruin everything else
Politics

McNutt v. DOJ could allow the justices to seize tremendous power over the US economy.

By Ian Millhiser
The Logoff
The new Hormuz blockade, briefly explainedThe new Hormuz blockade, briefly explained
The Logoff

Trump tries Iran’s playbook.

By Cameron Peters