Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

U.S. lawmakers are pressing Google to improve hiring and management in response to a fired employee’s anti-diversity memo

Rep. Ro Khanna and other lawmakers see the incident as another sign Silicon Valley has a diversity problem.

Advocates From MoveOn.org And Others Demonstrate At A ‘Kill The Bill’ Rally To Demand The House GOP Vote ‘No’ On Trumpcare At The Capitol
Advocates From MoveOn.org And Others Demonstrate At A ‘Kill The Bill’ Rally To Demand The House GOP Vote ‘No’ On Trumpcare At The Capitol
Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images for MoveOn.org

A controversial anti-diversity memo written by a now-fired Google employee isn’t just sending shockwaves across the search giant’s Silicon Valley campus — it’s setting off alarms in the U.S. Congress, too.

In response to the screed by former engineer James Damore — which attributed a lack of women in tech to “personality differences between genders” — lawmakers on Capitol Hill are slamming Google and its peers for failing manifestly to recruit, retain and protect workers of diverse backgrounds.

Among those calling for change is Rep. Ro Khanna, the tech industry-backed Democratic lawmaker who represents a slice of Silicon Valley. In a Medium post shared early with Recode on Thursday, Khanna called the memo “appalling and sexist.”

In Khanna’s estimation, the incident “highlights how far the tech community needs to go to address gender and racial stereotypes.” To that end, he added: “As a company with an immigrant founder, an immigrant CEO, and prominent women leaders, Google should strive to set the standard for diversity in the workplace.”

Earlier on Thursday, a quartet of lawmakers — Reps. Jan Schakowsky, Pramila Jayapal, Jamie Raskin and Robin Kelly — similarly slammed Google and the whole of the tech industry for its “diversity problem.”

Writing in a letter to the tech giant, the four members of Congress said Damore’s comments “might not reflect the views of Google as a company,” but they said the “discriminatory beliefs espoused within the memo point to a problematic culture and mindset that persists within the tech industry as a whole.”

“Unfortunately, the disclosure of this manifesto and release of recent diversity numbers by a number of tech companies, serve as further reminders that the very companies that aim to lead us into a connected future, maintain work environments that mirror America’s less inclusive past,” they continued.

A spokeswoman for Google did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.

The renewed criticism from Capitol Hill comes as Google CEO Sundar Pichai prepares to address the company’s 60,000 employees at an all-hands meeting later this afternoon.

In his now-infamous memo, Damore pointed to “personality differences” between men and women as one reason that fewer women serve as engineers at Google. And he railed against efforts to diversify the company, while slamming the search giant’s culture as an “ideological echo chamber where some ideas are too sacred to be honestly discussed.”

Women hold approximately 20 percent of U.S. tech jobs at Google, according to data published by the company in January, and they hold 25 percent of the search giant’s leadership positions. Otherwise, Google’s workforce is predominately male and white.

To that end, other U.S. lawmakers — including powerful groups like the Congressional Black Caucus — have pressed Google and its tech industry counterparts to get them to change their hiring and management practices. The political pressure led Google to add diversity and workforce issues to their lobbying agendas in Washington, D.C.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel