Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

FX will let you watch its shows without commercials — if you pay an extra $6 a month

AMC is trying (nearly) the same thing. Both of them are working with Comcast.

Fargo, Season 3
Fargo, Season 3
Fargo, Season 3
FX
Peter Kafka
Peter Kafka covered media and technology, and their intersection, at Vox. Many of his stories can be found in his Kafka on Media newsletter, and he also hosts the Recode Media podcast.

Would you pay more money to watch some TV shows without commercials — but only from one network, and only if you are already paying for cable TV?

We first posed this question in June, when AMC Networks announced a plan to offer “AMC Premiere,” a $5-a-month service it is launching with Comcast.

Now we get to ask it again. 21st Century Fox is launching “FX+”, which is very similar: Add $6 to your monthly Comcast* bill, and you can watch new shows from Fox’s FX and FXX, like “Fargo,” without commercials, when they air. And you can also watch a lot of older FX shows, like “Sons of Anarchy.”

Comcast and Fox execs say that the two services aren’t exactly the same, because the Fox version has many more episodes of older shows than AMC does. Seems to me that this like arguing for Rocky Road over Cookies and Cream, but your mileage may vary.

Another way of putting it: AMC has “The Walking Dead,” the most popular show on cable TV; FX has “Atlanta,” which is awesome but won’t air its second season until next year. And it’s quite likely you haven’t seen the first season.

Big picture: This is part of the TV Industrial Complex’s attempt to generate additional revenue (and make up for declines in its subscriber counts) by selling stuff it already owns for an additional fee — without cannibalizing its core business.

Later this year, we’re supposed to see ESPN’s attempt at this, when it launches a direct-to-consumer subscription service made up of sports it’s not showing on its conventional TV networks. (That one was originally supposed to debut last year, so 2017 isn’t a guarantee ...)

This strategy doesn’t sound like the worst idea. More like a “why not try it and see what happens” idea — if no one buys it, NBD. And if they do, extra money for Fox (or AMC) and Comcast.

On the other hand, it doesn’t take much work to find reasons not to sign up for services like this. For instance: FX+ will have full runs of great shows like “Louie” — but you can also find every old episode of “Louie” on Netflix, as well (for now). And if you’re looking for Season 2 of “Fargo,” FX+ won’t have that — but you can get it on Hulu (or pay $15 for it on iTunes, like I did this summer. It’s awesome.).

That’s not FX’s fault, necessarily. It mostly speaks to the confusing patchwork of rights and windows that surround media, period.

But it also reflects the fact that, until the last few years, TV guys were happy to sell off streaming rights to their shows, because they thought people like Netflix were overpaying for them.

Now they’re starting to think differently about that, and they’re more likely to keep these rights for themselves. Which may eventually increase the value of services like this one, one day.

* Comcast is an investor in Vox Media, which owns this site.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Podcasts
Anthropic just made AI scarierAnthropic just made AI scarier
Podcast
Podcasts

Why the company’s new AI model is a cybersecurity nightmare.

By Dustin DeSoto and Sean Rameswaram
Politics
The Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track youThe Supreme Court will decide when the police can use your phone to track you
Politics

Chatrie v. United States asks what limits the Constitution places on the surveillance state in an age of cellphones.

By Ian Millhiser
Future Perfect
The simple question that could change your careerThe simple question that could change your career
Future Perfect

Making a difference in the world doesn’t require changing your job.

By Bryan Walsh
Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol