Skip to main content

The context you need, when you need it

When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join now

Most tech investors think the industry’s companies are about to grow even more valuable

Less than half of investors said the same thing at the end of 2016.

Tech investors have grown increasingly bullish about the companies they fund over the last six months, even after a series of much-anticipated IPOs proved to pack more fizzle than pop in 2017.

Sixty-eight percent of investors told SharesPost, an industry research firm, that valuations for private companies will increase over the next 12 months. Only 49 percent said the same six months ago.

That’s despite the stock market’s unhappiness with new publicly traded tech companies like Snap and Blue Apron, whose shares have fallen below their initial IPO prices.

Gallons of available cash in venture capital have sent valuations for privately held companies skyrocketing lately, which may partly explain the uptick. Investors, of course, are inclined to predict high valuations for the companies they invest in (and that bring home cash for their firms), but that doesn’t wholly explain the change in sentiment here versus six months ago.

SoftBank’s latest Vision Fund, for instance, is playing with $100 billion — a reminder of the big appetite these days for tech investments.

The other figure that stands out from this survey: Investors are growing increasingly comfortable with secondary transactions, in which buyers can purchase existing shares from existing shareholders — even though the companies are private. Some in Silicon Valley view these trades as unreliable or perhaps even unsavory.

But now only 11 percent of investors describe these secondary shares as an unattractive asset class; twice as many respondents (23 percent) gave them a thumbs-down at the end of 2016.

We should note the sample size here is somewhat small — only 350 respondents for what SharesPost said is a margin of error of below six percentage points.


This article originally appeared on Recode.net.

More in Technology

Technology
The case for AI realismThe case for AI realism
Technology

AI isn’t going to be the end of the world — no matter what this documentary sometimes argues.

By Shayna Korol
Politics
OpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agendaOpenAI’s oddly socialist, wildly hypocritical new economic agenda
Politics

The AI company released a set of highly progressive policy ideas. There’s just one small problem.

By Eric Levitz
Future Perfect
Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.Human bodies aren’t ready to travel to Mars. Space medicine can help.
Future Perfect

Protecting astronauts in space — and maybe even Mars — will help transform health on Earth.

By Shayna Korol
Podcasts
The importance of space toilets, explainedThe importance of space toilets, explained
Podcast
Podcasts

Houston, we have a plumbing problem.

By Peter Balonon-Rosen and Sean Rameswaram
Technology
What happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputerWhat happened when they installed ChatGPT on a nuclear supercomputer
Technology

How they’re using AI at the lab that created the atom bomb.

By Joshua Keating
Future Perfect
Humanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious missionHumanity’s return to the moon is a deeply religious mission
Future Perfect

Space barons like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk don’t seem religious. But their quest to colonize outer space is.

By Sigal Samuel